Compare
Kent Town vs Rose Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.3 km apart · Kent Town profile · Rose Park profile
Kent Town Rose Park
Kent Town and Rose Park are neighbouring suburbs with very different lifestyles. Kent Town is a younger, more transient area where the typical resident is 36 and 63.4% moved in within the last five years. It has a high share of renters (57%) and people living alone (48.5%), with most residents living in flats or apartments. In contrast, Rose Park is older and more established, with a typical age of 44. It is a wealthier area where typical weekly household incomes are far higher at $2,411, compared to $1,461 in Kent Town, and many more residents own their homes outright (47%).
Both areas are very close to the national figure for the proportion of people who speak little or no English. They also share a similar urban feel, with both being just a four-minute drive from the city and having identical access to local amenities. However, Kent Town has seen a rise in its crime rate over the last five years, while the rate in Rose Park has fallen sharply.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,199
- First area, 2016: 1,210
- First area, 2021: 1,443
- Second area, 2011: 1,397
- Second area, 2016: 1,374
- Second area, 2021: 1,375
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kent Town: 0.4% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Rose Park: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Kent Town: 0.6% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Rose Park: 0.7% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Kent Town: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Rose Park: 3.1% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Kent Town: 2.1% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Rose Park: 3.0% males, 4.0% females
- 65–69 in Kent Town: 2.9% males, 1.8% females; 65–69 in Rose Park: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Kent Town: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Rose Park: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Kent Town: 3.2% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Rose Park: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Kent Town: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Rose Park: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Kent Town: 2.9% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Rose Park: 1.6% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Kent Town: 3.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Rose Park: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Kent Town: 4.0% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Rose Park: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Kent Town: 5.2% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Rose Park: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Kent Town: 6.4% males, 5.4% females; 25–29 in Rose Park: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Kent Town: 4.4% males, 3.9% females; 20–24 in Rose Park: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Kent Town: 7.7% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Rose Park: 2.5% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Kent Town: 2.3% males, 1.6% females; 10–14 in Rose Park: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Kent Town: 1.7% males, 1.0% females; 5–9 in Rose Park: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Kent Town: 0.6% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Rose Park: 2.2% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $544
- First area, 2016: $573
- First area, 2021: $831
- Second area, 2011: $829
- Second area, 2016: $941
- Second area, 2021: $1,132
- First area, 2011: $1,036
- First area, 2016: $1,116
- First area, 2021: $1,461
- Second area, 2011: $1,878
- Second area, 2016: $2,060
- Second area, 2021: $2,411
- First area, 2011: $1,680
- First area, 2016: $1,818
- First area, 2021: $2,086
- Second area, 2011: $2,668
- Second area, 2016: $2,777
- Second area, 2021: $3,397
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.8
- First area, 2016: 1.8
- First area, 2021: 1.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $324
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $365
- First area, 2011: $1,900
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,924
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,253
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Kent Town with nearby areas
Compare Rose Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kent Town vs Rose Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40680/kent-town/vs/SAL41273/rose-park