Compare
Island Lagoon vs Pimba
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Island Lagoon profile · Pimba profile
Island Lagoon Pimba
Pimba and Island Lagoon are both sparsely populated areas in South Australia. Pimba is a small residential area with 25 people, while Island Lagoon is largely non-residential with no population. Pimba has far higher street connectivity with 5 intersections per square kilometre, compared to none in Island Lagoon. The terrain in Island Lagoon is also a little steeper, with a mean slope of 3.5% compared to 2.0% in Pimba.
Daily life in both places is entirely car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of parks, schools, groceries, or health services. Neither area has any public transport routes or stops. This lack of local amenities is a shared trait for both locations, which both carry a walkability score of 0.0.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2016: 36
- Second area, 2021: 25
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- Second area, 2016: $769
- Second area, 2021: $866
- Second area, 2016: $899
- Second area, 2021: $1,416
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2016: 0.50
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Island Lagoon with nearby areas
Compare Pimba with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Island Lagoon vs Pimba [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40631/island-lagoon/vs/SAL41153/pimba