Compare
Clayton Bay vs Milang
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Clayton Bay profile · Milang profile
Clayton Bay Milang
Milang and Clayton Bay are nearby South Australian areas with a few striking differences. Milang is much more walkable and convenient for daily life, with a score of 3.7 (mostly car-dependent) and 85% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Clayton Bay is car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of shops. There are also sharp contrasts among First Nations residents; the typical person in Milang is far older at 27, while in Clayton Bay they are just 13, and typical personal income for this group is far higher in Clayton Bay at $1,041 compared to $450 in Milang.
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining very alike in their basic financial and social makeup. Both have almost identical typical household incomes around $860 a week and similar levels of education and volunteering. They both have older populations than the national figure, though Clayton Bay is slightly older, with a typical resident aged 60. Clayton Bay has seen more recent growth, with a far higher share of people moving in over the last five years at 48.4%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 240
- First area, 2016: 350
- First area, 2021: 472
- Second area, 2011: 883
- Second area, 2016: 883
- Second area, 2021: 962
- First area, 2011: 60 yrs
- First area, 2016: 60 yrs
- First area, 2021: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 55 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clayton Bay: 1.9% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Milang: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Clayton Bay: 0.8% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Milang: 1.7% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Clayton Bay: 4.6% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Milang: 2.9% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Clayton Bay: 5.9% males, 5.9% females; 70–74 in Milang: 6.7% males, 4.5% females
- 65–69 in Clayton Bay: 8.2% males, 6.1% females; 65–69 in Milang: 5.4% males, 6.2% females
- 60–64 in Clayton Bay: 5.5% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Milang: 5.0% males, 5.3% females
- 55–59 in Clayton Bay: 6.7% males, 6.9% females; 55–59 in Milang: 5.0% males, 5.1% females
- 50–54 in Clayton Bay: 2.7% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Milang: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Clayton Bay: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Milang: 2.4% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Clayton Bay: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 40–44 in Milang: 2.3% males, 0.8% females
- 35–39 in Clayton Bay: 2.5% males, 0.6% females; 35–39 in Milang: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Clayton Bay: 2.1% males, 1.0% females; 30–34 in Milang: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Clayton Bay: 0.6% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Milang: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Clayton Bay: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 20–24 in Milang: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Clayton Bay: 0.8% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Milang: 2.9% males, 1.9% females
- 10–14 in Clayton Bay: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 10–14 in Milang: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 5–9 in Clayton Bay: 2.1% males, 0.8% females; 5–9 in Milang: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Clayton Bay: 0.6% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Milang: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $386
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $489
- Second area, 2011: $394
- Second area, 2016: $464
- Second area, 2021: $496
- First area, 2011: $615
- First area, 2016: $763
- First area, 2021: $863
- Second area, 2011: $757
- Second area, 2016: $828
- Second area, 2021: $858
- First area, 2011: $723
- First area, 2016: $1,062
- First area, 2021: $1,140
- Second area, 2011: $919
- Second area, 2016: $1,057
- Second area, 2021: $1,167
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.8
- First area, 2016: 1.9
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $165
- First area, 2016: $210
- First area, 2021: $228
- Second area, 2011: $195
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $758
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,000
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Clayton Bay with nearby areas
Compare Milang with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clayton Bay vs Milang [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40265/clayton-bay/vs/SAL40873/milang