Compare

Clayton Bay vs Milang

Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Clayton Bay profile · Milang profile

Clayton Bay Milang

Milang and Clayton Bay are nearby South Australian areas with a few striking differences. Milang is much more walkable and convenient for daily life, with a score of 3.7 (mostly car-dependent) and 85% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Clayton Bay is car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of shops. There are also sharp contrasts among First Nations residents; the typical person in Milang is far older at 27, while in Clayton Bay they are just 13, and typical personal income for this group is far higher in Clayton Bay at $1,041 compared to $450 in Milang.

These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining very alike in their basic financial and social makeup. Both have almost identical typical household incomes around $860 a week and similar levels of education and volunteering. They both have older populations than the national figure, though Clayton Bay is slightly older, with a typical resident aged 60. Clayton Bay has seen more recent growth, with a far higher share of people moving in over the last five years at 48.4%.

Where they differ most

Demographics & Identity

Population in Clayton Bayin Milang +490 larger in Milang gap narrowing
472 64th pct 962 73rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 240
  • First area, 2016: 350
  • First area, 2021: 472
  • Second area, 2011: 883
  • Second area, 2016: 883
  • Second area, 2021: 962
Median age in Clayton Bayin Milang +5 yrs older in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
60 yrs 93rd pct 55 yrs 86th pct
  • First area, 2011: 60 yrs
  • First area, 2016: 60 yrs
  • First area, 2021: 60 yrs
  • Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
  • Second area, 2016: 51 yrs
  • Second area, 2021: 55 yrs
First Nations in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.7 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap steady
4.4% 70th pct 2.7% 58th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.3%
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • First area, 2021: 4.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 1.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 2.7%
Aged 65+ in Clayton Bayin Milang +7.6 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
38.8% 94th pct 31.2% 87th pct
  • First area, 2011: 34.7%
  • First area, 2016: 38.6%
  • First area, 2021: 38.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 18.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 31.2%
Under 15 in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.3 pts higher in Milang gap narrowing
10.0% 16th pct 11.2% 20th pct
  • First area, 2011: 6.2%
  • First area, 2016: 7.4%
  • First area, 2021: 10.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 15.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 14.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 11.2%
De facto in Clayton Bayin Milang +2.4 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap widening
15.6% 73rd pct 13.1% 58th pct
  • First area, 2011: 10.5%
  • First area, 2016: 11.3%
  • First area, 2021: 15.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 11.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 13.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 13.1%

Age structure

38.8% Seniors (65+) ◂ +7.6 pts 31.2%
36.4% Older adults (45–64) ◂ +4.0 pts 32.4%
11.0% Young adults (25–44) +6.3 pts ▸ 17.4%
10.0% Children (0–14) +1.3 pts ▸ 11.2%
2.8% Youth (15–24) +4.7 pts ▸ 7.5%

Marital status

49.9% Married ◂ +5.4 pts 44.5%
20.0% Never married +9.4 pts ▸ 29.5%
18.6% Divorced ◂ +2.8 pts 15.8%
5.8% Widowed +0.1 pts ▸ 5.9%
4.2% Separated +0.8 pts ▸ 5.0%

Age & sex structure

Clayton Bay Milang

Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.

  • 85+ in Clayton Bay: 1.9% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Milang: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
  • 80–84 in Clayton Bay: 0.8% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Milang: 1.7% males, 0.6% females
  • 75–79 in Clayton Bay: 4.6% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Milang: 2.9% males, 1.1% females
  • 70–74 in Clayton Bay: 5.9% males, 5.9% females; 70–74 in Milang: 6.7% males, 4.5% females
  • 65–69 in Clayton Bay: 8.2% males, 6.1% females; 65–69 in Milang: 5.4% males, 6.2% females
  • 60–64 in Clayton Bay: 5.5% males, 5.7% females; 60–64 in Milang: 5.0% males, 5.3% females
  • 55–59 in Clayton Bay: 6.7% males, 6.9% females; 55–59 in Milang: 5.0% males, 5.1% females
  • 50–54 in Clayton Bay: 2.7% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Milang: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
  • 45–49 in Clayton Bay: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Milang: 2.4% males, 3.3% females
  • 40–44 in Clayton Bay: 1.9% males, 1.5% females; 40–44 in Milang: 2.3% males, 0.8% females
  • 35–39 in Clayton Bay: 2.5% males, 0.6% females; 35–39 in Milang: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
  • 30–34 in Clayton Bay: 2.1% males, 1.0% females; 30–34 in Milang: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
  • 25–29 in Clayton Bay: 0.6% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Milang: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
  • 20–24 in Clayton Bay: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 20–24 in Milang: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
  • 15–19 in Clayton Bay: 0.8% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Milang: 2.9% males, 1.9% females
  • 10–14 in Clayton Bay: 1.3% males, 2.1% females; 10–14 in Milang: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
  • 5–9 in Clayton Bay: 2.1% males, 0.8% females; 5–9 in Milang: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
  • 0–4 in Clayton Bay: 0.6% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Milang: 1.5% males, 1.5% females

Ancestry & Birthplace

Born overseas in Clayton Bayin Milang +6.7 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
23.5% 83rd pct 16.8% 70th pct
  • First area, 2011: 25.8%
  • First area, 2016: 22.6%
  • First area, 2021: 23.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 17.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 16.8%

Country of birth

66.5% Australia +8.3 pts ▸ 74.8%
14.0% England ◂ +5.6 pts 8.4%
1.9% Philippines ◂ +1.2 pts 0.7%
1.1% New Zealand ◂ +0.3 pts 0.7%
0.0% India +0.7 pts ▸ 0.7%
0.0% China even 0.0%
0.0% Vietnam even 0.0%
0.0% Nepal even 0.0%
0.0% Italy even 0.0%
0.0% South Africa even 0.0%

Ancestry

48.1% English ◂ +1.7 pts 46.4%
31.6% Australian +4.0 pts ▸ 35.6%
11.4% Scottish ◂ +1.0 pts 10.4%
9.5% Irish ◂ +1.7 pts 7.8%
5.7% German +1.5 pts ▸ 7.2%
5.9% Dutch ◂ +3.9 pts 2.1%
1.9% Filipino ◂ +0.8 pts 1.1%
0.0% Italian +1.7 pts ▸ 1.7%
0.0% Chinese +0.4 pts ▸ 0.4%
0.0% Indian +0.4 pts ▸ 0.4%
0.0% Greek +0.4 pts ▸ 0.4%
0.0% Vietnamese even 0.0%

Language

Other language in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.2 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap steady
4.0% 55th pct 2.8% 45th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.7%
  • First area, 2016: 6.3%
  • First area, 2021: 4.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 2.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 2.8%
Limited English in Clayton Bayin Milang even gap steady
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.9%
  • First area, 2021: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.0%

Language used at home

87.1% English only +1.9 pts ▸ 89.0%
1.1% Tagalog ◂ +0.6 pts 0.4%
0.0% Mandarin even 0.0%
0.0% Arabic even 0.0%
0.0% Vietnamese even 0.0%
0.0% Cantonese even 0.0%
0.0% Punjabi even 0.0%
0.0% Greek even 0.0%
0.0% Italian even 0.0%
0.0% Hindi even 0.0%

Religion

No religion in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.3 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
54.0% 87th pct 52.7% 85th pct
  • First area, 2011: 26.3%
  • First area, 2016: 41.7%
  • First area, 2021: 54.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 31.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 39.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 52.7%

Religious affiliation

54.0% No religion ◂ +1.3 pts 52.7%
34.7% Christianity +1.8 pts ▸ 36.6%
10.2% Not stated ◂ +1.0 pts 9.1%
1.3% Islam ◂ +0.4 pts 0.8%
0.0% Other religions +0.5 pts ▸ 0.5%
0.0% Buddhism +0.4 pts ▸ 0.4%
0.0% Hinduism even 0.0%
0.0% Judaism even 0.0%

Education & Qualifications

Year 12 in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.2 pts higher in Milang gap narrowing
35.6% 25th pct 35.8% 25th pct
  • First area, 2011: 36.7%
  • First area, 2016: 35.0%
  • First area, 2021: 35.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 33.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 31.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 35.8%
Bachelor+ in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.9 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap widening
11.2% 35th pct 9.3% 27th pct
  • First area, 2011: 9.3%
  • First area, 2016: 10.6%
  • First area, 2021: 11.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 8.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 8.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 9.3%
Schools ≤3 km in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0 0th pct 0 0th pct

Highest year of school

35.6% Year 12 +0.2 pts ▸ 35.8%
24.2% Year 11 ◂ +2.8 pts 21.3%
21.3% Year 10 +0.8 pts ▸ 22.0%
10.0% Year 9 or below +0.8 pts ▸ 10.8%

Highest qualification level

44.9% Certificate III / IV ◂ +0.2 pts 44.8%
13.5% Advanced diploma / diploma ◂ +1.5 pts 12.0%
12.4% Bachelor degree ◂ +0.8 pts 11.6%
3.7% Graduate diploma / certificate ◂ +2.0 pts 1.7%
3.7% Certificate I / II ◂ +1.2 pts 2.6%
1.9% Postgraduate degree +1.8 pts ▸ 3.6%

Field of qualification

19.5% Engineering & related ◂ +1.9 pts 17.6%
16.1% Society & culture +0.2 pts ▸ 16.3%
11.2% Management & commerce ◂ +0.1 pts 11.1%
9.0% Education ◂ +3.0 pts 6.0%
7.5% Health +0.6 pts ▸ 8.1%
4.5% Food, hospitality & personal services +1.7 pts ▸ 6.2%
5.2% Architecture & building ◂ +1.2 pts 4.1%
4.5% Agriculture & environment +0.4 pts ▸ 4.9%
3.4% Creative arts ◂ +0.8 pts 2.6%
0.0% Natural & physical sciences +1.9 pts ▸ 1.9%
0.0% Information technology +1.1 pts ▸ 1.1%

Income

Personal income in Clayton Bayin Milang +$7 higher in Milang gap steady
$489 11th pct $496 12th pct
  • First area, 2011: $386
  • First area, 2016: $450
  • First area, 2021: $489
  • Second area, 2011: $394
  • Second area, 2016: $464
  • Second area, 2021: $496
Household income in Clayton Bayin Milang +$5 higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
$863 8th pct $858 8th pct
  • First area, 2011: $615
  • First area, 2016: $763
  • First area, 2021: $863
  • Second area, 2011: $757
  • Second area, 2016: $828
  • Second area, 2021: $858
Family income in Clayton Bayin Milang +$27 higher in Milang gap narrowing
$1,140 10th pct $1,167 11th pct
  • First area, 2011: $723
  • First area, 2016: $1,062
  • First area, 2021: $1,140
  • Second area, 2011: $919
  • Second area, 2016: $1,057
  • Second area, 2021: $1,167
High earners in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.9 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
3.7% 26th pct 2.8% 23rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.0%
  • First area, 2016: 1.9%
  • First area, 2021: 3.7%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 1.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 2.8%
High-income homes in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.9 pts higher in Milang gap narrowing
4.1% 13th pct 4.9% 15th pct
  • First area, 2011: 5.0%
  • First area, 2016: 1.7%
  • First area, 2021: 4.1%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 3.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.9%

Household income distribution

43.2% $650–$1,499 ◂ +1.5 pts 41.6%
30.5% Under $650 ◂ +2.5 pts 28.0%
15.0% $1,500–$2,999 ◂ +0.2 pts 14.8%
2.7% $3,000–$3,999 ◂ +0.1 pts 2.6%
1.4% $4,000 or more +1.0 pts ▸ 2.4%

Personal income distribution

57.3% Under $650 ◂ +1.6 pts 55.8%
28.7% $650–$1,499 ◂ +2.3 pts 26.4%
6.1% $1,500–$2,999 ◂ +1.3 pts 4.7%
1.6% $3,000 or more ◂ +0.1 pts 1.5%

Health & Disability

Health condition in Clayton Bayin Milang +4.3 pts higher in Clayton Bay
40.7% 90th pct 36.4% 82nd pct
Mental health in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.8 pts higher in Milang
10.6% 73rd pct 12.4% 86th pct
Needs assistance in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.7 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
9.7% 88th pct 9.0% 87th pct
  • First area, 2011: 9.2%
  • First area, 2016: 6.6%
  • First area, 2021: 9.7%
  • Second area, 2011: 5.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 9.0%

Long-term health conditions reported

17.4% Arthritis ◂ +4.6 pts 12.8%
10.6% Mental health +1.8 pts ▸ 12.4%
9.3% Other condition +1.0 pts ▸ 10.3%
9.5% Asthma ◂ +1.9 pts 7.6%
7.2% Diabetes +0.4 pts ▸ 7.6%
6.8% Heart disease even 6.8%
5.7% Cancer ◂ +1.7 pts 4.1%
3.2% Lung condition ◂ +0.5 pts 2.7%
3.0% Stroke ◂ +1.0 pts 2.0%
1.1% Dementia ◂ +0.1 pts 0.9%

Number of long-term health conditions

50.0% None +3.2 pts ▸ 53.2%
23.5% One condition ◂ +0.3 pts 23.2%
12.9% Two conditions ◂ +4.3 pts 8.6%
5.7% Three or more ◂ +0.7 pts 5.0%

Community Participation

Volunteering in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.8 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
22.8% 70th pct 22.1% 67th pct
  • First area, 2011: 36.1%
  • First area, 2016: 27.7%
  • First area, 2021: 22.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 31.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 22.1%
Unpaid carers in Clayton Bayin Milang +3.7 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap steady
19.1% 88th pct 15.4% 75th pct
  • First area, 2011: 17.8%
  • First area, 2016: 14.6%
  • First area, 2021: 19.1%
  • Second area, 2011: 14.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 13.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 15.4%
Unpaid child care in Clayton Bayin Milang +7.2 pts higher in Milang gap steady
13.5% 11th pct 20.8% 29th pct
  • First area, 2011: 17.3%
  • First area, 2016: 16.2%
  • First area, 2021: 13.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 24.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 24.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 20.8%
Defence service in Clayton Bayin Milang +2.0 pts higher in Clayton Bay
6.2% 87th pct 4.2% 74th pct
Housework 15h+ in Clayton Bayin Milang +5.8 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap steady
31.7% 84th pct 25.9% 60th pct
  • First area, 2011: 35.5%
  • First area, 2016: 25.9%
  • First area, 2021: 31.7%
  • Second area, 2011: 29.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 25.9%

First Nations

First Nations people in Clayton Bayin Milang +5 larger in Milang
21 69th pct 26 72nd pct
Median age in Clayton Bayin Milang +14 yrs older in Milang
13 yrs 9th pct 27 yrs 54th pct
34.8% 37th pct
Median income in Clayton Bayin Milang +$591 higher in Clayton Bay
$1,041 81st pct $450 25th pct
Household income in Clayton Bayin Milang even
$1,687 50th pct $1,687 50th pct
Indigenous language in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct

Family & Households

Household size in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.1 larger in Milang gap narrowing
1.9 11th pct 2.0 14th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.8
  • First area, 2016: 1.9
  • First area, 2021: 1.9
  • Second area, 2011: 2.3
  • Second area, 2016: 2.2
  • Second area, 2021: 2.0
One-parent in Clayton Bayin Milang +8.8 pts higher in Milang gap widening
7.0% 28th pct 15.8% 75th pct
  • First area, 2011: 10.1%
  • First area, 2016: 16.7%
  • First area, 2021: 7.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 13.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 16.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 15.8%
Living alone in Clayton Bayin Milang +0.1 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
37.7% 88th pct 37.6% 88th pct
  • First area, 2011: 43.8%
  • First area, 2016: 38.2%
  • First area, 2021: 37.7%
  • Second area, 2011: 29.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 32.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 37.6%

Family composition

61.3% Couples without children ◂ +18.8 pts 42.4%
33.8% Couples with children +8.5 pts ▸ 42.3%
7.0% One-parent families +8.8 pts ▸ 15.8%
0.0% Other families even 0.0%

Household size

44.1% 2 people ◂ +5.7 pts 38.4%
37.7% 1 person ◂ +0.1 pts 37.6%
10.0% 3 people +2.2 pts ▸ 12.2%
4.1% 4 people +4.4 pts ▸ 8.5%
2.7% 5 people +0.6 pts ▸ 3.3%
1.8% 6 or more ◂ +1.8 pts 0.0%

Housing & Dwellings

Rent in Clayton Bayin Milang +$22 higher in Milang gap steady
$228 33rd pct $250 40th pct
  • First area, 2011: $165
  • First area, 2016: $210
  • First area, 2021: $228
  • Second area, 2011: $195
  • Second area, 2016: $220
  • Second area, 2021: $250
Mortgage in Clayton Bayin Milang +$83 higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
$1,083 18th pct $1,000 14th pct
  • First area, 2011: $758
  • First area, 2016: $1,083
  • First area, 2021: $1,083
  • Second area, 2011: $1,300
  • Second area, 2016: $1,083
  • Second area, 2021: $1,000
People / bedroom in Clayton Bayin Milang even gap narrowing
0.70 14th pct 0.70 14th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.00
  • First area, 2016: 0.70
  • First area, 2021: 0.70
  • Second area, 2011: 1.10
  • Second area, 2016: 0.80
  • Second area, 2021: 0.70
Renting in Clayton Bayin Milang +6.7 pts higher in Milang gap widening
8.6% 22nd pct 15.3% 46th pct
  • First area, 2011: 10.8%
  • First area, 2016: 12.4%
  • First area, 2021: 8.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 15.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 15.3%
Owned outright in Clayton Bayin Milang +10.1 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
53.6% 82nd pct 43.5% 57th pct
  • First area, 2011: 54.2%
  • First area, 2016: 51.1%
  • First area, 2021: 53.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 38.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 40.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 43.5%
Separate houses in Clayton Bayin Milang +2.3 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap steady
95.5% 46th pct 93.2% 40th pct
  • First area, 2011: 96.7%
  • First area, 2016: 94.4%
  • First area, 2021: 95.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 94.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 95.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 93.2%
3+ bedrooms in Clayton Bayin Milang +4.2 pts higher in Milang gap narrowing
66.8% 23rd pct 71.1% 29th pct
  • First area, 2011: 61.2%
  • First area, 2016: 71.3%
  • First area, 2021: 66.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 71.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 68.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 71.1%

How homes are owned or rented

53.6% Owned outright ◂ +10.1 pts 43.5%
33.6% Owned with a mortgage +1.4 pts ▸ 35.1%
8.6% Rented +6.7 pts ▸ 15.3%
1.8% Other tenure +1.5 pts ▸ 3.3%
1.4% Not stated +0.8 pts ▸ 2.1%

Types of homes

95.5% Separate house ◂ +2.3 pts 93.2%
0.0% Other dwelling +5.2 pts ▸ 5.2%
2.3% Flat or apartment ◂ +0.9 pts 1.4%
0.0% Townhouse / semi-detached even 0.0%

Bedrooms per home

49.1% 3 bedrooms ◂ +2.0 pts 47.1%
13.6% 4 bedrooms +9.0 pts ▸ 22.6%
20.0% 2 bedrooms ◂ +1.6 pts 18.4%
7.7% 1 bedroom +0.3 pts ▸ 8.0%
4.1% 5 or more ◂ +2.7 pts 1.4%
1.8% Studio / none ◂ +1.8 pts 0.0%

Weekly rent distribution

21.1% $200–$349 +38.9 pts ▸ 60.0%
21.1% Under $200 +8.2 pts ▸ 29.2%
0.0% $350–$549 +9.2 pts ▸ 9.2%
0.0% $550–$749 even 0.0%
0.0% $750 or more even 0.0%

Monthly mortgage distribution

40.5% Under $1,000 +1.7 pts ▸ 42.3%
36.5% $1,000–$1,799 +1.8 pts ▸ 38.3%
18.9% $1,800–$2,999 ◂ +8.9 pts 10.1%
4.1% $3,000 or more ◂ +4.1 pts 0.0%

Transport & Vehicles

No car in Clayton Bayin Milang +3.1 pts higher in Milang gap widening
0.0% 0th pct 3.1% 63rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.4%
  • First area, 2016: 1.8%
  • First area, 2021: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 2.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.1%
Work from home in Clayton Bayin Milang +3.0 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap narrowing
12.8% 37th pct 9.8% 26th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.8%
  • First area, 2016: 3.7%
  • First area, 2021: 12.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 10.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 6.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 9.8%
PT commute in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.1 pts higher in Milang gap steady
0.0% 0th pct 1.1% 73rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.0%
  • First area, 2016: 0.0%
  • First area, 2021: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 1.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 1.1%
PT stops in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0 0th pct 0 0th pct
Stops/1k in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0.00 0th pct 0.00 0th pct
Departures/1k in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0.0 0th pct 0.0 0th pct
PT routes in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0 0th pct 0 0th pct
Drive to city in Clayton Bayin Milang +1 longer in Clayton Bay
62 45th pct 61 45th pct

How people get to work

70.1% Car (driver) +0.3 pts ▸ 70.5%
12.8% Worked at home ◂ +3.0 pts 9.8%
3.0% Car (passenger) +2.4 pts ▸ 5.4%
1.8% Walked +0.1 pts ▸ 1.9%
0.0% Bus +1.1 pts ▸ 1.1%
0.0% Train even 0.0%
0.0% Bicycle even 0.0%

Motor vehicles per home

35.1% 1 vehicle +3.7 pts ▸ 38.7%
38.4% 2 vehicles ◂ +3.5 pts 34.9%
16.6% 3 vehicles ◂ +3.8 pts 12.8%
7.1% 4 or more +3.1 pts ▸ 10.2%
0.0% No vehicle +3.1 pts ▸ 3.1%

Migration & Movement

Recent movers in Clayton Bayin Milang +14.7 pts higher in Clayton Bay gap widening
48.4% 89th pct 33.6% 60th pct
  • First area, 2011: 37.5%
  • First area, 2016: 44.4%
  • First area, 2021: 48.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 43.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 37.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 33.6%
Recent arrivals in Clayton Bayin Milang +9.3 pts higher in Milang gap widening
0.0% 0th pct 9.3% 61st pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.0%
  • First area, 2016: 5.1%
  • First area, 2021: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 5.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 9.3%

Jobs & Industry

Unemployment in Clayton Bayin Milang +6.2 pts higher in Milang gap widening
0.0% 0th pct 6.2% 78th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.5%
  • First area, 2016: 11.5%
  • First area, 2021: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 5.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.2%
Participation in Clayton Bayin Milang +6.8 pts higher in Milang gap narrowing
39.2% 8th pct 46.0% 14th pct
  • First area, 2011: 39.4%
  • First area, 2016: 38.0%
  • First area, 2021: 39.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 56.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 47.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 46.0%
Full-time in Clayton Bayin Milang +3.2 pts higher in Milang gap narrowing
51.8% 21st pct 55.0% 34th pct
  • First area, 2011: 47.6%
  • First area, 2016: 55.1%
  • First area, 2021: 51.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 57.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 53.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 55.0%

Industries people work in

20.7% Health care & social assistance ◂ +4.7 pts 16.0%
6.1% Agriculture, forestry & fishing +5.6 pts ▸ 11.7%
10.4% Construction ◂ +1.4 pts 8.9%
9.1% Retail trade ◂ +2.4 pts 6.8%
7.9% Manufacturing +1.0 pts ▸ 8.9%
7.9% Education & training +0.5 pts ▸ 8.4%
4.9% Accommodation & food +1.4 pts ▸ 6.2%
6.1% Administrative & support ◂ +0.7 pts 5.4%
3.0% Transport & warehousing +2.6 pts ▸ 5.7%
5.5% Public administration & safety ◂ +1.4 pts 4.1%
4.9% Mining ◂ +3.5 pts 1.4%
4.3% Arts & recreation ◂ +2.6 pts 1.6%

Occupations people work in

18.9% Community & personal service ◂ +3.2 pts 15.7%
14.6% Labourers +4.1 pts ▸ 18.7%
12.2% Technicians & trades +3.5 pts ▸ 15.7%
15.2% Professionals ◂ +9.0 pts 6.2%
14.6% Clerical & administrative ◂ +4.1 pts 10.6%
13.4% Managers ◂ +0.9 pts 12.5%
4.9% Machinery operators & drivers +3.8 pts ▸ 8.7%
4.3% Sales workers +2.0 pts ▸ 6.2%

Crime & Safety

Crime rate in Clayton Bayin Milang +704 higher in Milang
1,271 11th pct 1,975 25th pct
Assault/100k in Clayton Bayin Milang +304 higher in Milang
424 27th pct 728 52nd pct
Burglary/100k in Clayton Bayin Milang
520 53rd pct
312 14th pct
Property damage/100k in Clayton Bayin Milang +324 higher in Clayton Bay
636 45th pct 312 15th pct
5-yr change in Clayton Bayin Milang +4.1 pts higher in Clayton Bay
-40.0% 16th pct -44.1% 13th pct

Walkability

Walk score in Clayton Bayin Milang +3.2 higher in Milang
0.5 51st pct 3.7 76th pct
Types ≤15 min in Clayton Bayin Milang +3.7 more in Milang
0.6 54th pct 4.3 79th pct
15-min city in Clayton Bayin Milang +82.9 pts higher in Milang
0.0% 0th pct 82.9% 90th pct
Walk to shops in Clayton Bayin Milang +85.0 pts higher in Milang
0.0% 0th pct 85.0% 92nd pct
Walk to transit in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct
Walk to school in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct
Walk to a park in Clayton Bayin Milang +28.9 pts higher in Milang
59.6% 67th pct 88.5% 79th pct
Walk to health in Clayton Bayin Milang even
0.0% 0th pct 0.0% 0th pct
Amenities/1k in Clayton Bayin Milang +13.4 more in Milang
6.4 32nd pct 19.8 61st pct
Intersections/km² in Clayton Bayin Milang +1 higher in Clayton Bay
5 66th pct 4 64th pct
Mean slope in Clayton Bayin Milang +1.2 pts higher in Clayton Bay
4.4% 34th pct 3.2% 16th pct

Compare Clayton Bay with nearby areas

Compare Milang with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clayton Bay vs Milang [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40265/clayton-bay/vs/SAL40873/milang