Compare
Bugle Ranges vs Mount Barker Springs
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.9 km apart · Bugle Ranges profile · Mount Barker Springs profile
Bugle Ranges Mount Barker Springs
Bugle Ranges and Mount Barker Springs are neighbouring areas in South Australia with distinct economic profiles. Mount Barker Springs has a wealthier population, with a typical household income of $3,028 a week compared to $2,031 in Bugle Ranges. It also has a higher proportion of people who finished Year 12 (70.5% versus 55.0%) and more full-time workers. In contrast, Bugle Ranges has a noticeably older population, with 19.7% of residents aged 65 and over, compared to 14.9% in Mount Barker Springs. Among First Nations residents, Bugle Ranges sees much higher typical incomes and older typical ages.
Both areas are very similar in the types of homes they have, with around 90% of dwellings containing three or more bedrooms. They also share a similar level of higher education, with about 26% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. While Bugle Ranges has a higher share of people living alone and a higher typical rent of $268, Mount Barker Springs has a much higher share of people with no religion (52.3% versus 41.9%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 244
- First area, 2016: 242
- First area, 2021: 289
- Second area, 2011: 341
- Second area, 2016: 163
- Second area, 2021: 174
- First area, 2011: 49 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bugle Ranges: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Barker Springs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bugle Ranges: 1.4% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Barker Springs: 1.8% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bugle Ranges: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Mount Barker Springs: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Bugle Ranges: 2.8% males, 4.6% females; 70–74 in Mount Barker Springs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Bugle Ranges: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Mount Barker Springs: 6.0% males, 4.2% females
- 60–64 in Bugle Ranges: 4.3% males, 8.9% females; 60–64 in Mount Barker Springs: 3.0% males, 4.8% females
- 55–59 in Bugle Ranges: 4.3% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Mount Barker Springs: 6.0% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Bugle Ranges: 1.1% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Mount Barker Springs: 7.2% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Bugle Ranges: 5.0% males, 4.6% females; 45–49 in Mount Barker Springs: 4.8% males, 5.4% females
- 40–44 in Bugle Ranges: 3.2% males, 5.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Barker Springs: 1.8% males, 4.2% females
- 35–39 in Bugle Ranges: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Mount Barker Springs: 0.0% males, 1.8% females
- 30–34 in Bugle Ranges: 3.5% males, 1.1% females; 30–34 in Mount Barker Springs: 0.0% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Bugle Ranges: 1.1% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Barker Springs: 2.4% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Bugle Ranges: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 20–24 in Mount Barker Springs: 1.8% males, 4.2% females
- 15–19 in Bugle Ranges: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Mount Barker Springs: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Bugle Ranges: 5.7% males, 6.4% females; 10–14 in Mount Barker Springs: 1.8% males, 6.0% females
- 5–9 in Bugle Ranges: 1.4% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Mount Barker Springs: 6.0% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Bugle Ranges: 1.1% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Mount Barker Springs: 4.8% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $577
- First area, 2016: $735
- First area, 2021: $773
- Second area, 2011: $646
- Second area, 2016: $900
- Second area, 2021: $1,201
- First area, 2011: $1,452
- First area, 2016: $1,640
- First area, 2021: $2,031
- Second area, 2011: $1,319
- Second area, 2016: $2,194
- Second area, 2021: $3,028
- First area, 2011: $1,849
- First area, 2016: $1,702
- First area, 2021: $2,285
- Second area, 2011: $1,886
- Second area, 2016: $2,405
- Second area, 2021: $3,031
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $263
- First area, 2021: $268
- Second area, 2011: $255
- Second area, 2016: $225
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $2,058
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $2,184
- Second area, 2021: $2,084
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Bugle Ranges with nearby areas
Compare Mount Barker Springs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bugle Ranges vs Mount Barker Springs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL40181/bugle-ranges/vs/SAL40934/mount-barker-springs