Compare
New Auckland vs Telina
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · New Auckland profile · Telina profile
New Auckland Telina
New Auckland and Telina are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different profiles. New Auckland is a younger, more transient place where 48.8% of people moved in the last five years, compared to 34.7% in Telina. It is more family-oriented, with a higher share of children under 15 (24.0%) and a larger First Nations population. Telina is more established, with a typical resident aged 39 compared to 33 in New Auckland, and it offers much better access to local amenities, with 30.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school compared to just 0.8% in New Auckland.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people with a mental health condition, around 9.5%. They are also very similar in terms of typical weekly household incomes, which are about $2,000 in New Auckland and $1,927 in Telina. While they share these economic traits, the gap in accessibility is wide; Telina has far more public transport departures per 1,000 people and shorter walks to the nearest stop than New Auckland.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,711
- First area, 2016: 5,085
- First area, 2021: 5,266
- Second area, 2011: 2,179
- Second area, 2016: 2,143
- Second area, 2021: 2,197
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in New Auckland: 0.5% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Telina: 0.3% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in New Auckland: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Telina: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in New Auckland: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Telina: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in New Auckland: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in Telina: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in New Auckland: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Telina: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in New Auckland: 2.6% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Telina: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in New Auckland: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Telina: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in New Auckland: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Telina: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in New Auckland: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Telina: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in New Auckland: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Telina: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in New Auckland: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Telina: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in New Auckland: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Telina: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in New Auckland: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Telina: 2.5% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in New Auckland: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Telina: 2.5% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in New Auckland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Telina: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in New Auckland: 3.9% males, 4.6% females; 10–14 in Telina: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in New Auckland: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Telina: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in New Auckland: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 0–4 in Telina: 2.8% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $776
- First area, 2016: $740
- First area, 2021: $860
- Second area, 2011: $793
- Second area, 2016: $751
- Second area, 2021: $825
- First area, 2011: $1,952
- First area, 2016: $2,021
- First area, 2021: $2,009
- Second area, 2011: $2,344
- Second area, 2016: $1,911
- Second area, 2021: $1,927
- First area, 2011: $2,171
- First area, 2016: $2,205
- First area, 2021: $2,277
- Second area, 2011: $2,335
- Second area, 2016: $2,131
- Second area, 2021: $2,344
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $255
- First area, 2011: $2,019
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,612
- Second area, 2011: $1,900
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $1,545
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare New Auckland with nearby areas
Compare Telina with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). New Auckland vs Telina [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL32126/new-auckland/vs/SAL32767/telina