Compare
Clinton vs New Auckland
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Clinton profile · New Auckland profile
Clinton New Auckland
Clinton (Qld) and New Auckland are neighbouring areas in Queensland with similar population sizes. Clinton (Qld) is much more walkable for daily needs, with 66.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school compared to just 0.8% in New Auckland. This accessibility is reflected in Clinton (Qld) having more amenity types within a short walk and higher street connectivity. In contrast, New Auckland has a higher proportion of people earning $2,000 or more a week (16.0%) and more residents who finished Year 12 (52.0%).
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011 and share many characteristics, such as having almost identical shares of children under 15 and people who are not religious. They both have a high number of renters and a similar percentage of First Nations residents. While New Auckland has a higher share of people who have moved recently (48.8%), both areas sit well above the national figure for adults working or looking for work.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,917
- First area, 2016: 5,921
- First area, 2021: 6,170
- Second area, 2011: 4,711
- Second area, 2016: 5,085
- Second area, 2021: 5,266
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clinton: 0.4% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in New Auckland: 0.5% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Clinton: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in New Auckland: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Clinton: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in New Auckland: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 70–74 in Clinton: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in New Auckland: 1.3% males, 1.2% females
- 65–69 in Clinton: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in New Auckland: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Clinton: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in New Auckland: 2.6% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Clinton: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in New Auckland: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Clinton: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in New Auckland: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Clinton: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in New Auckland: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Clinton: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in New Auckland: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Clinton: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in New Auckland: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Clinton: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in New Auckland: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Clinton: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in New Auckland: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Clinton: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in New Auckland: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Clinton: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in New Auckland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Clinton: 5.0% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in New Auckland: 3.9% males, 4.6% females
- 5–9 in Clinton: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in New Auckland: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Clinton: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in New Auckland: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $787
- First area, 2016: $755
- First area, 2021: $775
- Second area, 2011: $776
- Second area, 2016: $740
- Second area, 2021: $860
- First area, 2011: $1,965
- First area, 2016: $1,721
- First area, 2021: $1,701
- Second area, 2011: $1,952
- Second area, 2016: $2,021
- Second area, 2021: $2,009
- First area, 2011: $2,129
- First area, 2016: $2,002
- First area, 2021: $2,013
- Second area, 2011: $2,171
- Second area, 2016: $2,205
- Second area, 2021: $2,277
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $2,080
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $2,019
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,612
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Clinton with nearby areas
Compare New Auckland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clinton vs New Auckland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30626/clinton/vs/SAL32126/new-auckland