Compare
Mountain Camp vs Pierces Creek
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.2 km apart · Mountain Camp profile · Pierces Creek profile
Mountain Camp Pierces Creek
Pierces Creek and Mountain Camp are both sparsely populated areas in Queensland. Pierces Creek is the larger of the two, with 95 people compared to 24 in Mountain Camp. There are stark differences in the two areas: residents are far older in Mountain Camp, where the typical age is 55, while the typical resident in Pierces Creek is 44. Health needs also differ, with people needing help with daily activities being far higher in Mountain Camp at 20.8%. In contrast, Pierces Creek has a much higher share of people who have moved in the last five years (40.0%) and a far higher share of people with no religion (41.1%).
Both areas have remained very similar in their lack of infrastructure, with neither having public transport or walkable amenities and both being car-dependent. They have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining small and rural. This is consistent with their shared lack of overseas-born residents and the fact that only English is spoken in both areas. Pierces Creek maintains a higher typical weekly personal income of $687, compared to $487 in Mountain Camp.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 24
- First area, 2021: 24
- Second area, 2011: 270
- Second area, 2016: 70
- Second area, 2021: 95
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $487
- Second area, 2011: $407
- Second area, 2016: $466
- Second area, 2021: $687
- First area, 2016: $1,187
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $955
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,583
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $1,437
- Second area, 2011: $1,158
- Second area, 2016: $1,375
- Second area, 2021: $1,708
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 1.8
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: $120
- Second area, 2016: $228
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2021: $660
- Second area, 2011: $2,080
- Second area, 2016: $1,842
- Second area, 2021: $1,550
- First area, 2016: 0.60
- First area, 2021: 0.60
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mountain Camp with nearby areas
Compare Pierces Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mountain Camp vs Pierces Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL32040/mountain-camp/vs/SAL32311/pierces-creek