Compare
Mango Hill vs North Lakes
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.8 km apart · Mango Hill profile · North Lakes profile
Mango Hill North Lakes
North Lakes and Mango Hill are neighbouring areas with distinct housing and transport layouts. North Lakes has far more separate houses (84.9% compared to 70.2% in Mango Hill) and far higher street connectivity. It also has a much higher number of public transport stops and a higher number of weekly departures per 1,000 people. In contrast, Mango Hill is more walkable for daily needs, with a far higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (90.4% versus 61.0%) and more homes within a 15-minute-city walkshed. Mango Hill also has a younger population, with a typical resident aged 31 compared to 35 in North Lakes.
Both areas have followed similar paths since 2011, remaining high-growth hubs where people frequently move. They are very alike in their typical weekly household incomes, which sit around $2,100, and both have an identical share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents at 2.6%. While Mango Hill has seen more recent arrivals from overseas, both areas sit well above the national figure for people who have moved house in the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,340
- First area, 2016: 8,434
- First area, 2021: 14,921
- Second area, 2011: 15,046
- Second area, 2016: 21,671
- Second area, 2021: 23,030
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in North Lakes: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in North Lakes: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Mango Hill: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in North Lakes: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Mango Hill: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in North Lakes: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Mango Hill: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in North Lakes: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Mango Hill: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 60–64 in North Lakes: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Mango Hill: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 55–59 in North Lakes: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Mango Hill: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 50–54 in North Lakes: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Mango Hill: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in North Lakes: 3.7% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 40–44 in North Lakes: 3.9% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Mango Hill: 5.3% males, 5.7% females; 35–39 in North Lakes: 3.5% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Mango Hill: 4.0% males, 5.0% females; 30–34 in North Lakes: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in North Lakes: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in North Lakes: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Mango Hill: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in North Lakes: 3.8% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in North Lakes: 4.6% males, 4.2% females
- 5–9 in Mango Hill: 5.2% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in North Lakes: 4.1% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Mango Hill: 4.8% males, 4.4% females; 0–4 in North Lakes: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $698
- First area, 2016: $826
- First area, 2021: $959
- Second area, 2011: $772
- Second area, 2016: $784
- Second area, 2021: $885
- First area, 2011: $1,678
- First area, 2016: $1,873
- First area, 2021: $2,145
- Second area, 2011: $1,769
- Second area, 2016: $1,829
- Second area, 2021: $2,092
- First area, 2011: $1,799
- First area, 2016: $1,978
- First area, 2021: $2,266
- Second area, 2011: $1,873
- Second area, 2016: $1,933
- Second area, 2021: $2,258
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $340
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $380
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $2,069
- First area, 2016: $2,017
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,300
- Second area, 2016: $2,076
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mango Hill with nearby areas
Compare North Lakes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mango Hill vs North Lakes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31747/mango-hill/vs/SAL32178/north-lakes