Compare
Clontarf vs Mango Hill
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.8 km apart · Clontarf profile · Mango Hill profile
Clontarf Mango Hill
Mango Hill and Clontarf (Moreton Bay - Qld) are neighbouring areas with very different populations. Mango Hill is a young, diverse hub where the typical resident is 31 and 27.7% of people are children under 15. It has a highly qualified workforce, with 27.4% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, and far more people born overseas (36.8%). In contrast, Clontarf (Moreton Bay - Qld) is much older; the typical resident is 46, and 22.3% of the population is aged 65 and over. This age gap is reflected in health and housing, as Clontarf (Moreton Bay - Qld) has far more people with long-term health conditions and a higher share of homes owned outright (30.1%).
Both areas share a similar daily environment, with nearly all homes within a short walk of a park and roughly the same drive time to the city. They also have similar rates of volunteering and a similar share of people in de facto relationships. While Mango Hill has seen a recent surge in growth—with 66% of residents moving in during the last five years—Clontarf (Moreton Bay - Qld) remains more stable. The gap in their populations is widening as Mango Hill attracts more young families and professionals, while Clontarf (Moreton Bay - Qld) maintains a larger proportion of older residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,911
- First area, 2016: 8,279
- First area, 2021: 8,446
- Second area, 2011: 4,340
- Second area, 2016: 8,434
- Second area, 2021: 14,921
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clontarf: 0.9% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Clontarf: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Clontarf: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Mango Hill: 0.4% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Clontarf: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Mango Hill: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Clontarf: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Mango Hill: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Clontarf: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Mango Hill: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Clontarf: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Mango Hill: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 50–54 in Clontarf: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Mango Hill: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Clontarf: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 45–49 in Mango Hill: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Clontarf: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 35–39 in Clontarf: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Mango Hill: 5.3% males, 5.7% females
- 30–34 in Clontarf: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Mango Hill: 4.0% males, 5.0% females
- 25–29 in Clontarf: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Clontarf: 2.7% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Clontarf: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Mango Hill: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Clontarf: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Clontarf: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Mango Hill: 5.2% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Clontarf: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Mango Hill: 4.8% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $530
- First area, 2016: $633
- First area, 2021: $704
- Second area, 2011: $698
- Second area, 2016: $826
- Second area, 2021: $959
- First area, 2011: $985
- First area, 2016: $1,204
- First area, 2021: $1,383
- Second area, 2011: $1,678
- Second area, 2016: $1,873
- Second area, 2021: $2,145
- First area, 2011: $1,279
- First area, 2016: $1,479
- First area, 2021: $1,848
- Second area, 2011: $1,799
- Second area, 2016: $1,978
- Second area, 2021: $2,266
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $310
- First area, 2021: $345
- Second area, 2011: $340
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,777
- First area, 2016: $1,700
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $2,069
- Second area, 2016: $2,017
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Clontarf with nearby areas
Compare Mango Hill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clontarf vs Mango Hill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30629/clontarf/vs/SAL31747/mango-hill