Compare
Horseshoe Lagoon vs Upper Haughton
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Horseshoe Lagoon profile · Upper Haughton profile
Horseshoe Lagoon Upper Haughton
Horseshoe Lagoon and Upper Haughton are nearby rural areas with very different profiles. Upper Haughton is a sparsely populated place where typical weekly family income is far higher at $4,750, compared to $1,666 in Horseshoe Lagoon. Education and work also differ sharply; 68% of people in Upper Haughton finished Year 12, while only 35.4% did in Horseshoe Lagoon. Upper Haughton has a much larger share of people working from home (44.4%) and a far higher rate of volunteering (42.9%).
Both areas are car-dependent and have similar rates of mental health conditions, which sit near the national figure. Horseshoe Lagoon is younger, with a typical resident aged 38 and a much higher share of children under 15 (24.4%). In contrast, Upper Haughton has no residents aged 65 and over and a typical age of 44. While Horseshoe Lagoon has more people with long-term health conditions (31%), Upper Haughton has a much larger share of people caring for children unpaid (50%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 217
- First area, 2021: 213
- Second area, 2016: 75
- Second area, 2021: 34
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Horseshoe Lagoon: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 0.0% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 4.4% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 5.4% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 12.0% females
- 45–49 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.9% males, 5.4% females; 45–49 in Upper Haughton: 12.0% males, 20.0% females
- 40–44 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 4.9% males, 5.9% females; 40–44 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 4.4% males, 2.0% females; 35–39 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.9% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 12.0% females
- 15–19 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Upper Haughton: 20.0% males, 12.0% females
- 10–14 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.4% males, 1.5% females; 10–14 in Upper Haughton: 12.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 5.9% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 5.9% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Upper Haughton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $558
- First area, 2021: $657
- Second area, 2016: $624
- Second area, 2021: $1,374
- First area, 2016: $1,357
- First area, 2021: $1,339
- Second area, 2016: $1,208
- Second area, 2021: $2,999
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $1,374
- Second area, 2021: $4,750
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $50
- First area, 2021: $256
- Second area, 2016: $213
- Second area, 2021: $90
- First area, 2016: $1,476
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Horseshoe Lagoon with nearby areas
Compare Upper Haughton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Horseshoe Lagoon vs Upper Haughton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31363/horseshoe-lagoon/vs/SAL32910/upper-haughton