Compare
Horseshoe Lagoon vs Mona Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 17 km apart · Horseshoe Lagoon profile · Mona Park profile
Horseshoe Lagoon Mona Park
Horseshoe Lagoon and Mona Park are nearby rural areas in Queensland with very different financial profiles. Mona Park is much wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $2,166 compared to $1,339 in Horseshoe Lagoon. This wealth is reflected in Mona Park's higher share of people earning $2,000 or more a week (23.4% versus 7.4%) and a much higher rate of adults working or looking for work. Horseshoe Lagoon is more diverse, with more people born overseas (14.1%) and a higher share of residents who use a language other than English at home (14.6%).
These two areas are seeing their age structures drift further apart, as seniors make up 17.4% of Horseshoe Lagoon but only 3.1% of Mona Park. Despite this, they share a similar physical environment where every home is a separate house and no one uses public transport to commute. Both areas also have a similar proportion of children under 15, around 24%, and almost identical numbers of people per home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 217
- First area, 2021: 213
- Second area, 2016: 104
- Second area, 2021: 97
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Horseshoe Lagoon: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 0.0% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Mona Park: 3.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 4.4% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Mona Park: 4.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 5.4% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Mona Park: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 9.0% females
- 45–49 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.9% males, 5.4% females; 45–49 in Mona Park: 7.0% males, 11.0% females
- 40–44 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 4.9% males, 5.9% females; 40–44 in Mona Park: 6.0% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 4.4% males, 2.0% females; 35–39 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Mona Park: 6.0% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.9% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Mona Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 1.5% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Mona Park: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 3.4% males, 1.5% females; 10–14 in Mona Park: 3.0% males, 9.0% females
- 5–9 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 5.9% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in Mona Park: 3.0% males, 6.0% females
- 0–4 in Horseshoe Lagoon: 5.9% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Mona Park: 4.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $558
- First area, 2021: $657
- Second area, 2016: $909
- Second area, 2021: $1,125
- First area, 2016: $1,357
- First area, 2021: $1,339
- Second area, 2016: $2,050
- Second area, 2021: $2,166
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $1,666
- Second area, 2016: $2,449
- Second area, 2021: $2,291
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $50
- First area, 2021: $256
- Second area, 2016: $43
- Second area, 2021: $150
- First area, 2016: $1,476
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,452
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Horseshoe Lagoon with nearby areas
Compare Mona Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Horseshoe Lagoon vs Mona Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31363/horseshoe-lagoon/vs/SAL31876/mona-park