Compare
Crestmead vs Park Ridge South
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.8 km apart · Crestmead profile · Park Ridge South profile
Crestmead Park Ridge South
Crestmead and Park Ridge South are neighbouring areas in Logan with very different layouts and populations. Crestmead is a young, densely populated hub where 27.2% of people are children and the typical resident is just 29. It is far more walkable (somewhat walkable) than Park Ridge South (car-dependent), with many more people living within a 15-minute walk of shops and schools. In contrast, Park Ridge South is an older area where the typical resident is 46, and it is far more likely that people own their homes outright, at 39.9% compared to just 15.5% in Crestmead.
These two areas share similar typical personal incomes and a nearly identical number of people per home. However, the gap in housing tenure is wide and persistent, with renting far higher in Crestmead at 45.0% compared to 13.1% in Park Ridge South. This contrast in home ownership is consistent with the income gap, as Park Ridge South has a far higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week at 24.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,210
- First area, 2016: 12,153
- First area, 2021: 12,271
- Second area, 2011: 1,778
- Second area, 2016: 1,762
- Second area, 2021: 1,680
- First area, 2011: 27 yrs
- First area, 2016: 28 yrs
- First area, 2021: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Crestmead: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Park Ridge South: 0.4% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Crestmead: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Park Ridge South: 1.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Crestmead: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Park Ridge South: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Crestmead: 1.3% males, 1.1% females; 70–74 in Park Ridge South: 1.8% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Crestmead: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Park Ridge South: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Crestmead: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 60–64 in Park Ridge South: 4.2% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Crestmead: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Park Ridge South: 4.0% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Crestmead: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Park Ridge South: 5.3% males, 4.3% females
- 45–49 in Crestmead: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Park Ridge South: 2.3% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Crestmead: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Park Ridge South: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Crestmead: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Park Ridge South: 2.3% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Crestmead: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 30–34 in Park Ridge South: 3.0% males, 1.9% females
- 25–29 in Crestmead: 3.9% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Park Ridge South: 3.1% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Crestmead: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Park Ridge South: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Crestmead: 4.4% males, 3.9% females; 15–19 in Park Ridge South: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Crestmead: 4.8% males, 4.4% females; 10–14 in Park Ridge South: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Crestmead: 5.1% males, 4.5% females; 5–9 in Park Ridge South: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Crestmead: 4.2% males, 4.2% females; 0–4 in Park Ridge South: 2.7% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $582
- First area, 2016: $606
- First area, 2021: $687
- Second area, 2011: $608
- Second area, 2016: $619
- Second area, 2021: $706
- First area, 2011: $1,193
- First area, 2016: $1,348
- First area, 2021: $1,468
- Second area, 2011: $1,680
- Second area, 2016: $1,823
- Second area, 2021: $1,965
- First area, 2011: $1,220
- First area, 2016: $1,378
- First area, 2021: $1,548
- Second area, 2011: $1,619
- Second area, 2016: $1,796
- Second area, 2021: $1,961
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $340
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $406
- Second area, 2016: $440
- Second area, 2021: $453
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,431
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,842
- Second area, 2021: $1,800
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Crestmead with nearby areas
Compare Park Ridge South with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Crestmead vs Park Ridge South [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30750/crestmead/vs/SAL32272/park-ridge-south