Compare
Clinton vs River Ranch
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 13 km apart · Clinton profile · River Ranch profile
Clinton River Ranch
Clinton (Qld) is a much larger, more active hub compared to the sparsely populated River Ranch. Clinton (Qld) is far more walkable and better connected, with 82.6% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport, while River Ranch is car-dependent. The two areas differ sharply in their demographics and housing: the typical resident in Clinton (Qld) is 34, compared to 44 in River Ranch. There is also a significant gap in housing tenure, with 35.3% of Clinton (Qld) households renting, which is far higher than the 11.6% in River Ranch.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people who volunteer, though this is far higher in River Ranch at 26.4%. They also share similar typical weekly personal incomes of around $720 to $775. While Clinton (Qld) is a more transient area with 41.7% of people moving in the last five years, River Ranch is more stable, with only 21.0% of residents arriving recently.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,917
- First area, 2016: 5,921
- First area, 2021: 6,170
- Second area, 2011: 313
- Second area, 2016: 357
- Second area, 2021: 269
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clinton: 0.4% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in River Ranch: 1.1% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Clinton: 0.5% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in River Ranch: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Clinton: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in River Ranch: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Clinton: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in River Ranch: 3.4% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Clinton: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in River Ranch: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Clinton: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in River Ranch: 2.6% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Clinton: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in River Ranch: 4.1% males, 5.2% females
- 50–54 in Clinton: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in River Ranch: 3.4% males, 4.9% females
- 45–49 in Clinton: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in River Ranch: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Clinton: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in River Ranch: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Clinton: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in River Ranch: 2.2% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Clinton: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in River Ranch: 3.0% males, 1.1% females
- 25–29 in Clinton: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in River Ranch: 1.9% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Clinton: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in River Ranch: 3.4% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Clinton: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in River Ranch: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Clinton: 5.0% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in River Ranch: 3.4% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Clinton: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 5–9 in River Ranch: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Clinton: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in River Ranch: 1.5% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $787
- First area, 2016: $755
- First area, 2021: $775
- Second area, 2011: $578
- Second area, 2016: $512
- Second area, 2021: $720
- First area, 2011: $1,965
- First area, 2016: $1,721
- First area, 2021: $1,701
- Second area, 2011: $1,589
- Second area, 2016: $1,575
- Second area, 2021: $2,333
- First area, 2011: $2,129
- First area, 2016: $2,002
- First area, 2021: $2,013
- Second area, 2011: $2,031
- Second area, 2016: $1,781
- Second area, 2021: $2,521
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $270
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $2,080
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,232
- Second area, 2021: $1,820
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Clinton with nearby areas
Compare River Ranch with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clinton vs River Ranch [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30626/clinton/vs/SAL32436/river-ranch