Compare
Carseldine vs Zillmere
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.7 km apart · Carseldine profile · Zillmere profile
Carseldine Zillmere
Carseldine and Zillmere are neighbouring areas in Brisbane with distinct housing and income profiles. Carseldine is more affluent, with 26.4% of households earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 13.1% in Zillmere. This wealth is reflected in the homes; Carseldine has far more large houses, with 88.7% of homes having three or more bedrooms, while Zillmere has a much higher share of renters at 53.0%. First Nations residents in Carseldine also have significantly higher typical incomes and Year 12 completion rates than those in Zillmere.
Both areas have a similar share of children under 15, which sits close to the national figure. While they share this commonality, Zillmere is more walkable and urban, with a very walkable score of 7.6 and far more people living within a 15-minute walk of health services and groceries. In contrast, Carseldine has a noticeably older population, with the typical resident being 41 compared to 34 in Zillmere.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,746
- First area, 2016: 9,541
- First area, 2021: 10,093
- Second area, 2011: 8,105
- Second area, 2016: 8,967
- Second area, 2021: 9,323
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Carseldine: 1.6% males, 3.3% females; 85+ in Zillmere: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Carseldine: 1.3% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Zillmere: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Carseldine: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Zillmere: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Carseldine: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Zillmere: 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Carseldine: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Zillmere: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Carseldine: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Zillmere: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Carseldine: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Zillmere: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Carseldine: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Zillmere: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Carseldine: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Zillmere: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Carseldine: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Zillmere: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Carseldine: 3.9% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Zillmere: 4.5% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Carseldine: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Zillmere: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
- 25–29 in Carseldine: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Zillmere: 4.9% males, 5.6% females
- 20–24 in Carseldine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Zillmere: 4.0% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Carseldine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Zillmere: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Carseldine: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Zillmere: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 5–9 in Carseldine: 2.6% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Zillmere: 3.0% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Carseldine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Zillmere: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $662
- First area, 2016: $777
- First area, 2021: $856
- Second area, 2011: $565
- Second area, 2016: $651
- Second area, 2021: $788
- First area, 2011: $1,609
- First area, 2016: $1,787
- First area, 2021: $2,048
- Second area, 2011: $1,052
- Second area, 2016: $1,221
- Second area, 2021: $1,426
- First area, 2011: $1,870
- First area, 2016: $2,057
- First area, 2021: $2,358
- Second area, 2011: $1,297
- Second area, 2016: $1,404
- Second area, 2021: $1,756
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $435
- Second area, 2011: $290
- Second area, 2016: $340
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,171
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,677
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Carseldine with nearby areas
Compare Zillmere with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Carseldine vs Zillmere [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30553/carseldine/vs/SAL33232/zillmere