Compare
Bundamba vs Ebbw Vale
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Bundamba profile · Ebbw Vale profile
Bundamba Ebbw Vale
Bundamba and Ebbw Vale are neighbouring areas in Ipswich with very different profiles. Bundamba is much younger, with a typical resident aged 35, while Ebbw Vale is far older at 43. Housing also differs; Bundamba has a far higher share of rentals at 41.6%, whereas Ebbw Vale has far more homes owned outright (36.5%). Bundamba is more connected to services, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a school and health services, and it has far more public transport departures per 1,000 people.
These two places share a very similar typical weekly personal income, with Bundamba at $702 and Ebbw Vale at $665. They also have nearly identical proportions of people born overseas and those who speak little or no English. While they track closely on these measures, Ebbw Vale has a much higher share of separate houses compared to Bundamba, and the two areas continue to show a significant gap in their age profiles.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,404
- First area, 2016: 6,514
- First area, 2021: 6,542
- Second area, 2011: 526
- Second area, 2016: 508
- Second area, 2021: 540
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundamba: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Ebbw Vale: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Bundamba: 0.6% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Ebbw Vale: 0.7% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Bundamba: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Ebbw Vale: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Bundamba: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Ebbw Vale: 1.6% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Bundamba: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Ebbw Vale: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Bundamba: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Ebbw Vale: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Ebbw Vale: 4.0% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Bundamba: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Ebbw Vale: 6.0% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Bundamba: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Ebbw Vale: 3.1% males, 1.5% females
- 40–44 in Bundamba: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Ebbw Vale: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Ebbw Vale: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Bundamba: 3.7% males, 4.3% females; 30–34 in Ebbw Vale: 4.8% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Bundamba: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 25–29 in Ebbw Vale: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Bundamba: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Ebbw Vale: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Bundamba: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Ebbw Vale: 1.6% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Bundamba: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Ebbw Vale: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Bundamba: 3.8% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Ebbw Vale: 4.8% males, 1.8% females
- 0–4 in Bundamba: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Ebbw Vale: 4.0% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $512
- First area, 2016: $602
- First area, 2021: $702
- Second area, 2011: $451
- Second area, 2016: $552
- Second area, 2021: $665
- First area, 2011: $1,060
- First area, 2016: $1,231
- First area, 2021: $1,383
- Second area, 2011: $914
- Second area, 2016: $1,022
- Second area, 2021: $1,255
- First area, 2011: $1,223
- First area, 2016: $1,389
- First area, 2021: $1,643
- Second area, 2011: $926
- Second area, 2016: $1,204
- Second area, 2021: $1,445
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $255
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $230
- Second area, 2016: $270
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,400
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,400
- Second area, 2016: $1,200
- Second area, 2021: $1,213
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundamba with nearby areas
Compare Ebbw Vale with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundamba vs Ebbw Vale [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30426/bundamba/vs/SAL30938/ebbw-vale