Compare
Bucasia vs Shoal Point
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.0 km apart · Bucasia profile · Shoal Point profile
Bucasia Shoal Point
Bucasia and Shoal Point are neighbouring areas with distinct profiles. Bucasia is younger, with a typical resident aged 35 and a higher share of children under 15 (23.4%). It is also much more walkable, with 46.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to 0% in Shoal Point. In contrast, Shoal Point has a higher typical weekly family income of $2,791 and a larger share of high-earning households, with 33.5% earning $3,000 or more per week.
These two places share a very similar makeup in several ways, including nearly identical shares of First Nations people and those who use a language other than English at home. They also have almost the same number of people per home and the same rate of long-term health conditions. While Bucasia has a much higher rental rate (31.9%) than Shoal Point (19.6%), Shoal Point has a much higher First Nations unemployment rate of 16.7%, compared to just 4.4% in Bucasia.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,257
- First area, 2016: 4,771
- First area, 2021: 4,915
- Second area, 2011: 1,086
- Second area, 2016: 977
- Second area, 2021: 1,104
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Shoal Point: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Shoal Point: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Bucasia: 1.3% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Shoal Point: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Bucasia: 1.7% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Shoal Point: 2.5% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Bucasia: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Shoal Point: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Bucasia: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Shoal Point: 4.3% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Bucasia: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Shoal Point: 5.8% males, 5.3% females
- 50–54 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Shoal Point: 4.8% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Shoal Point: 2.9% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Shoal Point: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Bucasia: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Shoal Point: 2.8% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Shoal Point: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Shoal Point: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Bucasia: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Shoal Point: 3.1% males, 1.1% females
- 15–19 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Shoal Point: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Bucasia: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Shoal Point: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Bucasia: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 5–9 in Shoal Point: 3.8% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Bucasia: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Shoal Point: 2.6% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $788
- First area, 2016: $747
- First area, 2021: $904
- Second area, 2011: $900
- Second area, 2016: $860
- Second area, 2021: $1,104
- First area, 2011: $1,841
- First area, 2016: $1,682
- First area, 2021: $2,005
- Second area, 2011: $2,150
- Second area, 2016: $2,054
- Second area, 2021: $2,434
- First area, 2011: $2,035
- First area, 2016: $1,923
- First area, 2021: $2,221
- Second area, 2011: $2,312
- Second area, 2016: $2,287
- Second area, 2021: $2,791
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $400
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $380
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,058
- First area, 2021: $1,666
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,050
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bucasia with nearby areas
Compare Shoal Point with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bucasia vs Shoal Point [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30402/bucasia/vs/SAL32556/shoal-point