Compare
Bucasia vs Eimeo
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.9 km apart · Bucasia profile · Eimeo profile
Bucasia Eimeo
Bucasia and Eimeo are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different levels of accessibility. Bucasia is far more connected to public transport, with 18 stops compared to just 2 in Eimeo, and 89% of its homes are within a 10-minute walk of a stop. This makes Bucasia much more walkable, as 27% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, while only 3% do in Eimeo. Eimeo tends to be wealthier, with 27.9% of households earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 21% in Bucasia, and a higher share of residents holding a bachelor degree or higher (16.2% versus 12%).
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining much more mobile than other regions with over 40% of residents moving in the last five years. They share a very similar demographic profile, including nearly identical shares of children under 15 and people aged 65 and over. While both areas have a higher share of people with no religion than the national figure, this is even more pronounced in Bucasia at 48.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,257
- First area, 2016: 4,771
- First area, 2021: 4,915
- Second area, 2011: 3,309
- Second area, 2016: 3,230
- Second area, 2021: 3,285
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Eimeo: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Eimeo: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Bucasia: 1.3% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Eimeo: 1.1% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Bucasia: 1.7% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Eimeo: 1.6% males, 1.2% females
- 65–69 in Bucasia: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Eimeo: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Bucasia: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Eimeo: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Bucasia: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Eimeo: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Eimeo: 3.4% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Eimeo: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Eimeo: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Bucasia: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Eimeo: 4.1% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Eimeo: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Eimeo: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Bucasia: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Eimeo: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Eimeo: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Bucasia: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 10–14 in Eimeo: 4.2% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Bucasia: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 5–9 in Eimeo: 4.4% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Bucasia: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Eimeo: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $788
- First area, 2016: $747
- First area, 2021: $904
- Second area, 2011: $850
- Second area, 2016: $860
- Second area, 2021: $1,031
- First area, 2011: $1,841
- First area, 2016: $1,682
- First area, 2021: $2,005
- Second area, 2011: $2,204
- Second area, 2016: $1,967
- Second area, 2021: $2,304
- First area, 2011: $2,035
- First area, 2016: $1,923
- First area, 2021: $2,221
- Second area, 2011: $2,279
- Second area, 2016: $2,150
- Second area, 2021: $2,531
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $400
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,058
- First area, 2021: $1,666
- Second area, 2011: $2,383
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bucasia with nearby areas
Compare Eimeo with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bucasia vs Eimeo [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30402/bucasia/vs/SAL30951/eimeo