Compare
Blue Mountain Heights vs Cranley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.8 km apart · Blue Mountain Heights profile · Cranley profile
Blue Mountain Heights Cranley
Cranley and Blue Mountain Heights are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Cranley is a much older area, where the typical resident is 60 and 45.6% of people are aged 65 or over. It also has a higher share of renters (25.5%) and many more people living alone (32.9%). In contrast, Blue Mountain Heights is wealthier and more professional, with a typical weekly household income of $2,392 compared to $1,112 in Cranley. It has far more residents with bachelor degrees (36.8%) and a higher proportion of large homes, with 99.1% having three or more bedrooms.
These two areas are drifting further apart in several ways, particularly regarding income and education. While they share a similar lack of residents who speak little or no English and almost identical rates of full-time employment, the gap in weekly household income is now $1,280. This divide is mirrored in their homes; Blue Mountain Heights is almost entirely made up of separate houses, while Cranley has a much higher share of townhouses and semi-detached homes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 818
- First area, 2016: 929
- First area, 2021: 988
- Second area, 2011: 852
- Second area, 2016: 1,446
- Second area, 2021: 2,281
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 60 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Blue Mountain Heights: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Cranley: 2.8% males, 4.4% females
- 80–84 in Blue Mountain Heights: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Cranley: 4.7% males, 4.6% females
- 75–79 in Blue Mountain Heights: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Cranley: 4.9% males, 7.1% females
- 70–74 in Blue Mountain Heights: 3.0% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Cranley: 3.7% males, 5.6% females
- 65–69 in Blue Mountain Heights: 4.0% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Cranley: 2.9% males, 4.4% females
- 60–64 in Blue Mountain Heights: 4.7% males, 5.2% females; 60–64 in Cranley: 2.3% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Blue Mountain Heights: 3.3% males, 5.0% females; 55–59 in Cranley: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 50–54 in Blue Mountain Heights: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Cranley: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 45–49 in Blue Mountain Heights: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Cranley: 1.7% males, 1.6% females
- 40–44 in Blue Mountain Heights: 1.7% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Cranley: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
- 35–39 in Blue Mountain Heights: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Cranley: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 30–34 in Blue Mountain Heights: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Cranley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Blue Mountain Heights: 1.1% males, 2.3% females; 25–29 in Cranley: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Blue Mountain Heights: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Cranley: 2.3% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Blue Mountain Heights: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Cranley: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Blue Mountain Heights: 4.3% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Cranley: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Blue Mountain Heights: 4.6% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Cranley: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 0–4 in Blue Mountain Heights: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Cranley: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $732
- First area, 2016: $892
- First area, 2021: $971
- Second area, 2011: $464
- Second area, 2016: $587
- Second area, 2021: $634
- First area, 2011: $1,765
- First area, 2016: $2,237
- First area, 2021: $2,392
- Second area, 2011: $1,035
- Second area, 2016: $1,097
- Second area, 2021: $1,112
- First area, 2011: $1,913
- First area, 2016: $2,307
- First area, 2021: $2,508
- Second area, 2011: $1,160
- Second area, 2016: $1,335
- Second area, 2021: $1,318
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,777
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,837
- Second area, 2016: $1,647
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountain Heights with nearby areas
Compare Cranley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountain Heights vs Cranley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30291/blue-mountain-heights/vs/SAL30744/cranley