Compare
Bamaga vs Umagico
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.1 km apart · Bamaga profile · Umagico profile
Bamaga Umagico
Bamaga and Umagico are neighbouring areas in the Northern Peninsula Area. Bamaga is more walkable and has better access to schools, health services and groceries, while Umagico is car-dependent. There are significant differences in employment and education; Bamaga has a far higher share of people who finished Year 12 (54.8% compared to 30.1% in Umagico) and a far higher typical weekly household income ($1,630 versus $939). Unemployment is also far higher in Umagico, where 34.5% of people are out of work compared to 9.0% in Bamaga.
Both areas share a very young population and high proportions of First Nations people, with almost all homes in both places located within a short walk of a park. Gaps between them have shifted over time, most notably with unemployment in Umagico becoming far higher than in Bamaga. They remain similar in other ways, such as having the same typical weekly rent of around $120 to $125 and nearly identical rates of people needing help with daily activities.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,046
- First area, 2016: 1,164
- First area, 2021: 1,186
- Second area, 2011: 281
- Second area, 2016: 427
- Second area, 2021: 394
- First area, 2011: 22 yrs
- First area, 2016: 24 yrs
- First area, 2021: 25 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 25 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 20 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 20 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bamaga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Umagico: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bamaga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Umagico: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bamaga: 0.4% males, 0.3% females; 75–79 in Umagico: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Bamaga: 1.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Umagico: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Bamaga: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Umagico: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Bamaga: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Umagico: 1.8% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Bamaga: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Umagico: 1.3% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Bamaga: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Umagico: 2.3% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Bamaga: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Umagico: 1.6% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Bamaga: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Umagico: 2.3% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Bamaga: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Umagico: 1.3% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Bamaga: 3.8% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Umagico: 2.3% males, 5.2% females
- 25–29 in Bamaga: 2.7% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Umagico: 4.9% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Bamaga: 3.3% males, 4.8% females; 20–24 in Umagico: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 15–19 in Bamaga: 4.3% males, 4.4% females; 15–19 in Umagico: 3.1% males, 5.7% females
- 10–14 in Bamaga: 6.0% males, 4.8% females; 10–14 in Umagico: 6.5% males, 5.7% females
- 5–9 in Bamaga: 5.7% males, 6.0% females; 5–9 in Umagico: 7.3% males, 7.5% females
- 0–4 in Bamaga: 5.6% males, 4.4% females; 0–4 in Umagico: 5.7% males, 8.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $554
- First area, 2016: $568
- First area, 2021: $749
- Second area, 2011: $294
- Second area, 2016: $332
- Second area, 2021: $508
- First area, 2011: $1,179
- First area, 2016: $1,337
- First area, 2021: $1,630
- Second area, 2011: $572
- Second area, 2016: $991
- Second area, 2021: $939
- First area, 2011: $1,152
- First area, 2016: $1,259
- First area, 2021: $1,522
- Second area, 2011: $617
- Second area, 2016: $846
- Second area, 2021: $890
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.7
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 3.7
- Second area, 2016: 4.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $60
- First area, 2016: $112
- First area, 2021: $120
- Second area, 2011: $55
- Second area, 2016: $125
- Second area, 2021: $125
- First area, 2011: 1.60
- First area, 2016: 1.30
- First area, 2021: 1.30
- Second area, 2011: 1.50
- Second area, 2016: 1.40
- Second area, 2021: 1.30
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bamaga with nearby areas
Compare Umagico with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bamaga vs Umagico [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30135/bamaga/vs/SAL32895/umagico