Compare
Albany Creek vs Bridgeman Downs
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Albany Creek profile · Bridgeman Downs profile
Albany Creek Bridgeman Downs
Albany Creek and Bridgeman Downs are neighbouring areas with distinct profiles. Albany Creek is very walkable, with 75.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and a walkability score of 6.2 (very walkable). In contrast, Bridgeman Downs is somewhat walkable, with only 24.2% of homes near groceries and a score of 4.0. There are also notable differences in background and income; 33.2% of Bridgeman Downs residents were born overseas compared to 20.6% in Albany Creek, and the typical weekly household income in Bridgeman Downs is $2,878, which is well higher than the $2,267 in Albany Creek.
Daily life in both places shares many similarities, as they have almost identical proportions of children under 15 and people aged 65 and over. They also track closely in their commitment to community, with similar rates of volunteering and unpaid care. Both areas have a high share of large homes, with more than 92% of dwellings in each area having three or more bedrooms, far above the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,860
- First area, 2016: 15,769
- First area, 2021: 16,385
- Second area, 2011: 7,445
- Second area, 2016: 8,440
- Second area, 2021: 10,938
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Albany Creek: 0.5% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Bridgeman Downs: 0.8% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Albany Creek: 0.9% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Bridgeman Downs: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Albany Creek: 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Bridgeman Downs: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Albany Creek: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Albany Creek: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Albany Creek: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Albany Creek: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Albany Creek: 3.7% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Albany Creek: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 45–49 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Albany Creek: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Albany Creek: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.2% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Albany Creek: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Albany Creek: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Albany Creek: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Albany Creek: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Albany Creek: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Albany Creek: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Bridgeman Downs: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Albany Creek: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Bridgeman Downs: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $712
- First area, 2016: $786
- First area, 2021: $954
- Second area, 2011: $772
- Second area, 2016: $851
- Second area, 2021: $1,092
- First area, 2011: $1,807
- First area, 2016: $1,962
- First area, 2021: $2,267
- Second area, 2011: $2,264
- Second area, 2016: $2,408
- Second area, 2021: $2,878
- First area, 2011: $2,012
- First area, 2016: $2,195
- First area, 2021: $2,556
- Second area, 2011: $2,413
- Second area, 2016: $2,587
- Second area, 2021: $3,071
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $362
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $440
- Second area, 2011: $410
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,950
- First area, 2021: $2,037
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,262
- Second area, 2021: $2,500
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Albany Creek with nearby areas
Compare Bridgeman Downs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Albany Creek vs Bridgeman Downs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30020/albany-creek/vs/SAL30369/bridgeman-downs