Compare
Officer South vs Pakenham
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.1 km apart · Officer South profile · Pakenham profile
Officer South Pakenham
Pakenham and Officer South are neighbouring areas in Victoria with very different layouts and lifestyles. Pakenham is a much larger hub where 30.8% of homes are rented, compared to just 6.6% in Officer South. Pakenham is also far more walkable, with 74.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 76.6% near a school, whereas Officer South has no homes within that distance of either. In contrast, Officer South is more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $2,085 compared to $1,664 in Pakenham, and a higher share of university graduates at 28.9%.
Both areas share very similar levels of volunteerism and nearly identical drive times to the city. They have also seen a huge influx of new residents, though this is most extreme in Officer South, where 91.1% of people moved in during the last five years. While Pakenham is somewhat walkable, Officer South is mostly car-dependent. This gap in accessibility is striking for two areas only 6.1 km apart.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 75
- First area, 2021: 1,159
- Second area, 2011: 33,999
- Second area, 2016: 46,421
- Second area, 2021: 54,118
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Officer South: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Pakenham: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Officer South: 0.5% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Pakenham: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Officer South: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Pakenham: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Officer South: 2.7% males, 3.7% females; 70–74 in Pakenham: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Officer South: 2.0% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Pakenham: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Officer South: 1.3% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Pakenham: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Officer South: 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 55–59 in Pakenham: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Officer South: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 50–54 in Pakenham: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Officer South: 2.1% males, 1.2% females; 45–49 in Pakenham: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Officer South: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Pakenham: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Officer South: 4.8% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Pakenham: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Officer South: 5.8% males, 6.3% females; 30–34 in Pakenham: 4.5% males, 4.9% females
- 25–29 in Officer South: 7.9% males, 7.9% females; 25–29 in Pakenham: 4.0% males, 4.2% females
- 20–24 in Officer South: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Pakenham: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Officer South: 1.4% males, 0.9% females; 15–19 in Pakenham: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Officer South: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 10–14 in Pakenham: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Officer South: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 5–9 in Pakenham: 4.4% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Officer South: 5.4% males, 4.1% females; 0–4 in Pakenham: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $547
- First area, 2021: $1,017
- Second area, 2011: $603
- Second area, 2016: $660
- Second area, 2021: $783
- First area, 2016: $1,218
- First area, 2021: $2,085
- Second area, 2011: $1,229
- Second area, 2016: $1,374
- Second area, 2021: $1,664
- First area, 2016: $1,218
- First area, 2021: $2,403
- Second area, 2011: $1,384
- Second area, 2016: $1,537
- Second area, 2021: $1,879
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $393
- Second area, 2011: $291
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $351
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,777
- Second area, 2016: $1,700
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Officer South with nearby areas
Compare Pakenham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Officer South vs Pakenham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL22007/officer-south/vs/SAL22027/pakenham