Compare
Officer vs Pakenham
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.5 km apart · Officer profile · Pakenham profile
Officer Pakenham
Pakenham and Officer are neighbouring areas in Victoria with different profiles. Officer is more highly qualified, with 28.1% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 17.9% in Pakenham. It is also a newer destination; 71.5% of its residents moved there in the last five years, while that figure is 46.7% for Pakenham. This growth is reflected in typical weekly household incomes, which are well higher in Officer at $2,125 compared to $1,664 in Pakenham.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people born overseas. They also share very similar household sizes, with an average of about 2.9 people per home. While they are alike in these ways, a gap in education and income has widened since 2011. Pakenham also remains more accessible for some, with a typical 3-minute walk to the nearest transport stop compared to 7 minutes in Officer.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,761
- First area, 2016: 7,133
- First area, 2021: 18,503
- Second area, 2011: 33,999
- Second area, 2016: 46,421
- Second area, 2021: 54,118
- First area, 2011: 31 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Officer: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Pakenham: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Officer: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Pakenham: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Officer: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Pakenham: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Officer: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in Pakenham: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Officer: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Pakenham: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Officer: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 60–64 in Pakenham: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 55–59 in Officer: 1.6% males, 2.2% females; 55–59 in Pakenham: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Officer: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 50–54 in Pakenham: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Officer: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Pakenham: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Officer: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Pakenham: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Officer: 5.4% males, 5.5% females; 35–39 in Pakenham: 4.3% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Officer: 5.3% males, 6.2% females; 30–34 in Pakenham: 4.5% males, 4.9% females
- 25–29 in Officer: 4.2% males, 5.0% females; 25–29 in Pakenham: 4.0% males, 4.2% females
- 20–24 in Officer: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Pakenham: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Officer: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Pakenham: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Officer: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Pakenham: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Officer: 4.5% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Pakenham: 4.4% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Officer: 5.1% males, 4.9% females; 0–4 in Pakenham: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $757
- First area, 2016: $855
- First area, 2021: $970
- Second area, 2011: $603
- Second area, 2016: $660
- Second area, 2021: $783
- First area, 2011: $1,752
- First area, 2016: $1,866
- First area, 2021: $2,125
- Second area, 2011: $1,229
- Second area, 2016: $1,374
- Second area, 2021: $1,664
- First area, 2011: $1,877
- First area, 2016: $1,961
- First area, 2021: $2,256
- Second area, 2011: $1,384
- Second area, 2016: $1,537
- Second area, 2021: $1,879
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $361
- First area, 2021: $396
- Second area, 2011: $291
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $351
- First area, 2011: $2,080
- First area, 2016: $1,900
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,777
- Second area, 2016: $1,700
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Officer with nearby areas
Compare Pakenham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Officer vs Pakenham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL22006/officer/vs/SAL22027/pakenham