Compare
Kimbolton vs Redesdale
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.7 km apart · Kimbolton profile · Redesdale profile
Kimbolton Redesdale
Redesdale and Kimbolton (Vic.) are neighbouring rural areas, though they differ significantly in their populations and demographics. Redesdale has a much older population, with 28.8% aged 65 and over, and more people living alone at 35.2%. It is also more highly qualified, with 21.6% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to just 3.6% in Kimbolton (Vic.). Redesdale's residents are more likely to volunteer (23.8%) and earn more, with a typical weekly family income of $1,875, which is well higher than the $1,416 typical in Kimbolton (Vic.).
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, but they share a common rural reality where public transport is nonexistent. Both areas have zero public transport stops and zero departures, and no one commutes by public transport. They are also very similar in their work patterns, with about 57% of people in both places employed full-time. While Redesdale has more amenities within a short walk, such as a school and parks, both areas remain largely car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 73
- First area, 2021: 96
- Second area, 2011: 273
- Second area, 2016: 240
- Second area, 2021: 299
- First area, 2016: 53 yrs
- First area, 2021: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 57 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Redesdale: 2.1% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Redesdale: 1.0% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Kimbolton: 5.4% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Redesdale: 3.8% males, 2.8% females
- 70–74 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 4.3% females; 70–74 in Redesdale: 7.0% males, 3.8% females
- 65–69 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 5.4% females; 65–69 in Redesdale: 4.5% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Kimbolton: 3.2% males, 9.7% females; 60–64 in Redesdale: 6.3% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Kimbolton: 15.1% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Redesdale: 3.5% males, 6.6% females
- 50–54 in Kimbolton: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Redesdale: 5.2% males, 4.5% females
- 45–49 in Kimbolton: 3.2% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Redesdale: 3.8% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Kimbolton: 3.2% males, 6.5% females; 40–44 in Redesdale: 1.7% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Redesdale: 1.7% males, 1.0% females
- 30–34 in Kimbolton: 3.2% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Redesdale: 1.7% males, 1.4% females
- 25–29 in Kimbolton: 5.4% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Redesdale: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Redesdale: 1.0% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 6.5% females; 15–19 in Redesdale: 2.4% males, 1.4% females
- 10–14 in Kimbolton: 4.3% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Redesdale: 0.0% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Redesdale: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Kimbolton: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Redesdale: 1.0% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $681
- First area, 2021: $575
- Second area, 2011: $443
- Second area, 2016: $391
- Second area, 2021: $678
- First area, 2016: $1,093
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $1,011
- Second area, 2016: $880
- Second area, 2021: $1,180
- First area, 2016: $1,333
- First area, 2021: $1,416
- Second area, 2011: $1,180
- Second area, 2016: $1,071
- Second area, 2021: $1,875
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.7
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $50
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2016: $1,800
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,454
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,509
- First area, 2016: 0.60
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kimbolton with nearby areas
Compare Redesdale with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimbolton vs Redesdale [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL21356/kimbolton/vs/SAL22154/redesdale