Compare
High Camp vs Pyalong
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.5 km apart · High Camp profile · Pyalong profile
High Camp Pyalong
Pyalong and High Camp are neighbouring rural areas with different profiles. Pyalong is more connected, with more public transport stops and a school within 3km, while High Camp is more affluent. Typical household income is well higher in High Camp at $2,083 compared to $1,661 in Pyalong. Home ownership also differs sharply; 59.5% of High Camp homes are owned outright, which is far higher than the 31.4% in Pyalong. Pyalong has a younger feel, with a higher share of children under 15 (20.3% versus 14.8%) and a typical resident age of 42, which is noticeably younger than the 46 year typical age in High Camp.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, from a nearly identical mix of detached houses to the same 65-minute drive time to the city. They are also alike in the share of people born overseas and the typical weekly rent, which sits around $290 to $300. While High Camp has more people owning their homes outright, Pyalong has more residents in de facto relationships. The two areas have remained largely consistent with each other in these core housing and demographic patterns since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 108
- First area, 2021: 122
- Second area, 2011: 736
- Second area, 2016: 660
- Second area, 2021: 772
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in High Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Pyalong: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Pyalong: 0.4% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Pyalong: 1.7% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in High Camp: 4.5% males, 2.7% females; 70–74 in Pyalong: 2.6% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in High Camp: 5.4% males, 8.9% females; 65–69 in Pyalong: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in High Camp: 6.3% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Pyalong: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Pyalong: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in High Camp: 6.3% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Pyalong: 5.3% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in High Camp: 7.1% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Pyalong: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in High Camp: 6.3% males, 8.9% females; 40–44 in Pyalong: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Pyalong: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Pyalong: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in High Camp: 2.7% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Pyalong: 3.4% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in High Camp: 3.6% males, 6.3% females; 20–24 in Pyalong: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in High Camp: 3.6% males, 4.5% females; 15–19 in Pyalong: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in High Camp: 2.7% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Pyalong: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 8.0% females; 5–9 in Pyalong: 3.3% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in High Camp: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Pyalong: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $489
- First area, 2021: $820
- Second area, 2011: $451
- Second area, 2016: $567
- Second area, 2021: $728
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $2,083
- Second area, 2011: $979
- Second area, 2016: $1,286
- Second area, 2021: $1,661
- First area, 2016: $1,833
- First area, 2021: $2,562
- Second area, 2011: $1,116
- Second area, 2016: $1,465
- Second area, 2021: $2,013
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2016: $240
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2016: $2,300
- First area, 2021: $2,102
- Second area, 2011: $1,408
- Second area, 2016: $1,509
- Second area, 2021: $1,482
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare High Camp with nearby areas
Compare Pyalong with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). High Camp vs Pyalong [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL21184/high-camp/vs/SAL22129/pyalong