Compare
Clayton South vs Dingley Village
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.6 km apart · Clayton South profile · Dingley Village profile
Clayton South Dingley Village
Clayton South and Dingley Village are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Clayton South is a younger and more culturally diverse hub, where 62.8% of people were born overseas and 67.1% use a language other than English at home. It has a higher proportion of renters (39.4%) and more people with bachelor degrees (34.3%). In contrast, Dingley Village is older and more established, with a typical resident aged 45 compared to 34 in Clayton South. Housing there is dominated by separate houses (80.4%) and outright ownership (45.7%), and the typical weekly family income is well higher at $2,335.
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the number of people per home, which sits at 2.7. This shared household size exists alongside a growing gap in mobility; 46.2% of Clayton South residents moved in the last five years, a figure far higher than the 24.1% in Dingley Village. While Clayton South has a higher share of recent overseas arrivals, Dingley Village has a higher share of seniors and people with long-term health conditions.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,625
- First area, 2016: 12,642
- First area, 2021: 13,381
- Second area, 2011: 10,186
- Second area, 2016: 10,320
- Second area, 2021: 10,495
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clayton South: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Dingley Village: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Clayton South: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Dingley Village: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Clayton South: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Dingley Village: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Clayton South: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Dingley Village: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Clayton South: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Dingley Village: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Clayton South: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Dingley Village: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Clayton South: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Dingley Village: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Clayton South: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Dingley Village: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Clayton South: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Dingley Village: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Clayton South: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Dingley Village: 3.1% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Clayton South: 4.3% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Dingley Village: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Clayton South: 5.5% males, 4.8% females; 30–34 in Dingley Village: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Clayton South: 7.4% males, 5.3% females; 25–29 in Dingley Village: 2.1% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Clayton South: 4.8% males, 3.7% females; 20–24 in Dingley Village: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Clayton South: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Dingley Village: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Clayton South: 2.0% males, 1.8% females; 10–14 in Dingley Village: 3.9% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Clayton South: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Dingley Village: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Clayton South: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Dingley Village: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $411
- First area, 2016: $489
- First area, 2021: $685
- Second area, 2011: $606
- Second area, 2016: $695
- Second area, 2021: $799
- First area, 2011: $1,052
- First area, 2016: $1,257
- First area, 2021: $1,630
- Second area, 2011: $1,375
- Second area, 2016: $1,595
- Second area, 2021: $1,980
- First area, 2011: $1,113
- First area, 2016: $1,342
- First area, 2021: $1,743
- Second area, 2011: $1,662
- Second area, 2016: $1,939
- Second area, 2021: $2,335
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $295
- First area, 2016: $342
- First area, 2021: $381
- Second area, 2011: $311
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $450
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,680
- First area, 2021: $1,997
- Second area, 2011: $1,825
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $2,058
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Clayton South with nearby areas
Compare Dingley Village with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clayton South vs Dingley Village [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20570/clayton-south/vs/SAL20758/dingley-village