Compare
Bannockburn vs Russells Bridge
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.6 km apart · Bannockburn profile · Russells Bridge profile
Bannockburn Russells Bridge
Bannockburn (Vic.) and Russells Bridge are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Bannockburn (Vic.) is a larger hub with a typical resident aged 35 and a high proportion of people who have moved there in the last five years (39.2%). In contrast, Russells Bridge is sparsely populated and much older, with a typical age of 52 and 42.9% of people aged 65 and over. Financial patterns also differ; high-income households earning $3,000 or more a week are far more common in Russells Bridge at 40.7%, compared to 23.4% in Bannockburn (Vic.).
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the share of children under 15, with Bannockburn (Vic.) at 25.1% and Russells Bridge at 24.3%. Beyond this, the two places diverge sharply in lifestyle and accessibility. Bannockburn (Vic.) is mostly car-dependent but has some walkable amenities, while Russells Bridge is completely car-dependent with no public transport stops. This gap in infrastructure is mirrored in the workforce, with far more adults working or looking for work in Bannockburn (Vic.) at 68.1%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,513
- First area, 2016: 5,283
- First area, 2021: 6,470
- Second area, 2011: 143
- Second area, 2016: 67
- Second area, 2021: 70
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bannockburn: 0.5% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bannockburn: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Russells Bridge: 5.7% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bannockburn: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Russells Bridge: 8.6% males, 4.3% females
- 70–74 in Bannockburn: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Russells Bridge: 5.7% males, 4.3% females
- 65–69 in Bannockburn: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Russells Bridge: 4.3% males, 4.3% females
- 60–64 in Bannockburn: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 4.3% females
- 55–59 in Bannockburn: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Russells Bridge: 7.1% males, 5.7% females
- 50–54 in Bannockburn: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Russells Bridge: 11.4% males, 8.6% females
- 40–44 in Bannockburn: 3.4% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 5.7% females
- 35–39 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Bannockburn: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Bannockburn: 2.6% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Bannockburn: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Bannockburn: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Russells Bridge: 7.1% males, 5.7% females
- 5–9 in Bannockburn: 4.8% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Russells Bridge: 7.1% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Bannockburn: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Russells Bridge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $608
- First area, 2016: $704
- First area, 2021: $845
- Second area, 2011: $790
- Second area, 2016: $743
- Second area, 2021: $756
- First area, 2011: $1,493
- First area, 2016: $1,661
- First area, 2021: $2,055
- Second area, 2011: $1,481
- Second area, 2016: $1,416
- Second area, 2021: $1,343
- First area, 2011: $1,601
- First area, 2016: $1,775
- First area, 2021: $2,232
- Second area, 2011: $1,937
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,416
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $260
- First area, 2016: $320
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2011: $175
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,749
- First area, 2021: $1,863
- Second area, 2011: $1,980
- Second area, 2016: $1,150
- Second area, 2021: $1,100
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bannockburn with nearby areas
Compare Russells Bridge with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bannockburn vs Russells Bridge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20133/bannockburn/vs/SAL22216/russells-bridge