Compare
Bannockburn vs Maude
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Bannockburn profile · Maude profile
Bannockburn Maude
Bannockburn (Vic.) and Maude (Vic.) are nearby Victorian areas with very different scales of activity. Bannockburn (Vic.) is a larger hub with a walkability score of 3.4 (mostly car-dependent) and a typical resident aged 35, whereas Maude (Vic.) is much smaller, car-dependent (0.4), and older, with a typical age of 42. Bannockburn (Vic.) has far more infrastructure, including 11 intersections per km² and many more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (39.1%) and health services (36.5%), both of which are at 0.0% in Maude (Vic.). In contrast, Maude (Vic.) has a far higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (34.4% compared to 23.4% in Bannockburn (Vic.)) and a much higher rate of volunteering at 33.5%.
Typical weekly personal incomes are almost identical in both places, sitting around $840. This common ground exists alongside other similarities, such as similar unemployment rates and nearly the same share of people with long-term health conditions. However, the two areas are drifting apart in some ways; the gap in people who have moved into the area in the last five years has widened, with 39.2% for Bannockburn (Vic.) and 28.0% for Maude (Vic.).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,513
- First area, 2016: 5,283
- First area, 2021: 6,470
- Second area, 2011: 303
- Second area, 2016: 223
- Second area, 2021: 211
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bannockburn: 0.5% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Maude: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bannockburn: 0.7% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Maude: 2.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bannockburn: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Maude: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Bannockburn: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Maude: 0.0% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Bannockburn: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Maude: 2.9% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Bannockburn: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Maude: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Bannockburn: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Maude: 1.5% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Bannockburn: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Maude: 9.3% males, 7.3% females
- 45–49 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Maude: 1.5% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Bannockburn: 3.4% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Maude: 4.4% males, 5.4% females
- 35–39 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Maude: 3.9% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Bannockburn: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Maude: 0.0% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Bannockburn: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Maude: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 20–24 in Bannockburn: 2.6% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Maude: 5.4% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Bannockburn: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Maude: 3.9% males, 5.4% females
- 10–14 in Bannockburn: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Maude: 5.9% males, 1.5% females
- 5–9 in Bannockburn: 4.8% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Maude: 4.4% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Bannockburn: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Maude: 4.4% males, 5.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $608
- First area, 2016: $704
- First area, 2021: $845
- Second area, 2011: $496
- Second area, 2016: $657
- Second area, 2021: $837
- First area, 2011: $1,493
- First area, 2016: $1,661
- First area, 2021: $2,055
- Second area, 2011: $1,286
- Second area, 2016: $1,562
- Second area, 2021: $2,214
- First area, 2011: $1,601
- First area, 2016: $1,775
- First area, 2021: $2,232
- Second area, 2011: $1,673
- Second area, 2016: $2,031
- Second area, 2021: $2,333
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $260
- First area, 2016: $320
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2021: $480
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,749
- First area, 2021: $1,863
- Second area, 2011: $1,567
- Second area, 2016: $1,555
- Second area, 2021: $2,124
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bannockburn with nearby areas
Compare Maude with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bannockburn vs Maude [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20133/bannockburn/vs/SAL21624/maude