Compare
Avonsleigh vs Mount Burnett
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.4 km apart · Avonsleigh profile · Mount Burnett profile
Avonsleigh Mount Burnett
Avonsleigh and Mount Burnett are neighbouring areas in Victoria with very different profiles. Avonsleigh is more populated and has a higher proportion of children under 15 (19.3% compared to 9.4% in Mount Burnett). It is also more qualified, with 20.1% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 8.6% in Mount Burnett. In contrast, Mount Burnett has a higher share of high-earners, with 38.8% of households earning $3,000 or more a week, compared to 25.8% in Avonsleigh.
Both areas are almost identical in their housing styles, as every single home in both places is a separate detached house. They also share very similar typical weekly incomes, around $2,100. Despite these commonalities, Avonsleigh is more walkable, being mostly car-dependent while Mount Burnett is simply car-dependent. Avonsleigh also provides better access to essentials, with 75.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, whereas Mount Burnett has no homes within that distance.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 735
- First area, 2016: 852
- First area, 2021: 844
- Second area, 2016: 173
- Second area, 2021: 180
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Avonsleigh: 0.4% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Burnett: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Avonsleigh: 1.0% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Mount Burnett: 0.0% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Avonsleigh: 1.3% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Mount Burnett: 0.0% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Avonsleigh: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Mount Burnett: 2.2% males, 3.9% females
- 65–69 in Avonsleigh: 4.1% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Mount Burnett: 2.8% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Avonsleigh: 5.0% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Mount Burnett: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Avonsleigh: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Mount Burnett: 6.7% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Avonsleigh: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Burnett: 3.4% males, 4.5% females
- 45–49 in Avonsleigh: 4.4% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Mount Burnett: 3.4% males, 6.7% females
- 40–44 in Avonsleigh: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Mount Burnett: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 35–39 in Avonsleigh: 2.7% males, 5.1% females; 35–39 in Mount Burnett: 1.7% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Avonsleigh: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Mount Burnett: 2.2% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Avonsleigh: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Mount Burnett: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Avonsleigh: 2.2% males, 1.6% females; 20–24 in Mount Burnett: 6.7% males, 5.0% females
- 15–19 in Avonsleigh: 4.4% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Mount Burnett: 6.7% males, 8.9% females
- 10–14 in Avonsleigh: 5.0% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Mount Burnett: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 5–9 in Avonsleigh: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Mount Burnett: 0.0% males, 1.7% females
- 0–4 in Avonsleigh: 3.4% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Mount Burnett: 0.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $536
- First area, 2016: $706
- First area, 2021: $866
- Second area, 2016: $752
- Second area, 2021: $717
- First area, 2011: $1,452
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $2,055
- Second area, 2016: $2,139
- Second area, 2021: $2,166
- First area, 2011: $1,383
- First area, 2016: $2,016
- First area, 2021: $2,242
- Second area, 2016: $2,031
- Second area, 2021: $2,666
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $226
- First area, 2016: $318
- First area, 2021: $356
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,400
- First area, 2016: $1,700
- First area, 2021: $1,859
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,405
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Avonsleigh with nearby areas
Compare Mount Burnett with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Avonsleigh vs Mount Burnett [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20091/avonsleigh/vs/SAL21779/mount-burnett