Compare
Red Range vs Stonehenge
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 19 km apart · Red Range profile · Stonehenge profile
Red Range Stonehenge
Red Range and Stonehenge (NSW) are two sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. Red Range is much younger, with 22.3% of people being children under 15, compared to just 8.1% in Stonehenge (NSW). This helps explain why 25.7% of people in Red Range are unpaid carers for children, while only 13.4% are in Stonehenge (NSW). In contrast, Stonehenge (NSW) is far older, where the typical resident is 55 and 27.9% of the population is aged 65 or over. Income for First Nations households also differs sharply, with the typical amount being far higher in Stonehenge (NSW) at $2,250 than in Red Range, where it is $725.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people aged 65 and over, and they share a very similar typical weekly household income of around $1,400. They are also alike in their reliance on cars, as no one in either area uses public transport to commute. While Red Range has more people working from home and a higher share of full-time employment, Stonehenge (NSW) has a higher proportion of people born overseas.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 606
- First area, 2016: 187
- First area, 2021: 247
- Second area, 2011: 219
- Second area, 2016: 130
- Second area, 2021: 136
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 55 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Red Range: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Red Range: 0.0% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Stonehenge: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Red Range: 3.3% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Red Range: 3.7% males, 5.7% females; 70–74 in Stonehenge: 3.9% males, 7.1% females
- 65–69 in Red Range: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Stonehenge: 4.7% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Red Range: 5.7% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Stonehenge: 10.2% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Red Range: 3.3% males, 4.5% females; 55–59 in Stonehenge: 2.4% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Red Range: 4.1% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Stonehenge: 6.3% males, 8.7% females
- 45–49 in Red Range: 4.5% males, 2.4% females; 45–49 in Stonehenge: 3.9% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Red Range: 1.6% males, 1.2% females; 40–44 in Stonehenge: 4.7% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Red Range: 5.7% males, 1.6% females; 35–39 in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Red Range: 3.3% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Red Range: 0.0% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Red Range: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 20–24 in Stonehenge: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Red Range: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Stonehenge: 3.9% males, 4.7% females
- 10–14 in Red Range: 2.9% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Stonehenge: 3.1% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Red Range: 3.7% males, 7.3% females; 5–9 in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Red Range: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Stonehenge: 0.0% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $347
- First area, 2016: $452
- First area, 2021: $735
- Second area, 2011: $523
- Second area, 2016: $680
- Second area, 2021: $641
- First area, 2011: $684
- First area, 2016: $937
- First area, 2021: $1,388
- Second area, 2011: $1,297
- Second area, 2016: $1,312
- Second area, 2021: $1,406
- First area, 2011: $780
- First area, 2016: $1,166
- First area, 2021: $1,656
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,687
- Second area, 2021: $1,531
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $90
- First area, 2016: $170
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2011: $80
- Second area, 2016: $185
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $813
- First area, 2021: $1,187
- Second area, 2011: $3,467
- Second area, 2016: $1,486
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Red Range with nearby areas
Compare Stonehenge with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Red Range vs Stonehenge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13346/red-range/vs/SAL13680/stonehenge