Compare
Mount Mitchell vs Red Range
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Mount Mitchell profile · Red Range profile
Mount Mitchell Red Range
Red Range and Mount Mitchell are two nearby rural areas with different family profiles. Red Range is more likely to have children, with 22.3% of people under 15 compared to 10.4% in Mount Mitchell. Homes in Red Range are also typically larger, with 83.1% having three or more bedrooms, while only 47.2% of Mount Mitchell homes do. In contrast, Mount Mitchell has a much older typical resident age of 53 and a far higher share of people in de facto relationships at 36.4%.
Daily life in both places is very similar, with both being car-dependent and having no public transport. They share similar rates of people needing help with daily activities and almost no one who speaks little or no English. While Red Range has slightly higher typical incomes and a higher share of university graduates, the gap in First Nations household income is quite large, with Mount Mitchell's typical figure of $1,625 far higher than the $725 seen in Red Range.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 83
- First area, 2021: 106
- Second area, 2011: 606
- Second area, 2016: 187
- Second area, 2021: 247
- First area, 2016: 53 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Red Range: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Red Range: 0.0% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Red Range: 3.3% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Mount Mitchell: 6.5% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Red Range: 3.7% males, 5.7% females
- 65–69 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 4.3% females; 65–69 in Red Range: 0.0% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Mount Mitchell: 16.1% males, 9.7% females; 60–64 in Red Range: 5.7% males, 2.9% females
- 55–59 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 7.5% females; 55–59 in Red Range: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Mount Mitchell: 6.5% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Red Range: 4.1% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Mount Mitchell: 4.3% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Red Range: 4.5% males, 2.4% females
- 40–44 in Mount Mitchell: 5.4% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Red Range: 1.6% males, 1.2% females
- 35–39 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Red Range: 5.7% males, 1.6% females
- 30–34 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Red Range: 3.3% males, 4.5% females
- 25–29 in Mount Mitchell: 6.5% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Red Range: 0.0% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Mount Mitchell: 5.4% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Red Range: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 15–19 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Red Range: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Red Range: 2.9% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Mount Mitchell: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Red Range: 3.7% males, 7.3% females
- 0–4 in Mount Mitchell: 4.3% males, 5.4% females; 0–4 in Red Range: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $484
- First area, 2021: $585
- Second area, 2011: $347
- Second area, 2016: $452
- Second area, 2021: $735
- First area, 2016: $866
- First area, 2021: $1,174
- Second area, 2011: $684
- Second area, 2016: $937
- Second area, 2021: $1,388
- First area, 2016: $1,156
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2011: $780
- Second area, 2016: $1,166
- Second area, 2021: $1,656
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.7
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $58
- First area, 2021: $180
- Second area, 2011: $90
- Second area, 2016: $170
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2016: $836
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $813
- Second area, 2021: $1,187
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Mitchell with nearby areas
Compare Red Range with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Mitchell vs Red Range [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12789/mount-mitchell/vs/SAL13346/red-range