Compare
Nanima vs Springrange
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.9 km apart · Nanima profile · Springrange profile
Nanima Springrange
Springrange and Nanima are neighbouring rural areas in the Yass Valley. Springrange is more likely to have homes owned outright (46.1% compared to 33.3% in Nanima) and has a higher share of renters (19.9% versus 8.6%). Education levels vary, with Year 12 completion far higher in Nanima at 82.3%, compared to 68.4% in Springrange. Springrange also has more local infrastructure, including three schools and a few walkable amenities and parks, while Nanima has none.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people aged 65 and over, with Springrange at 17.3% and Nanima at 13.9%. They are very similar in other ways, including a typical resident age of 43 and a shared reliance on cars for travel. Most homes in both areas have three or more bedrooms, and the typical weekly rent is around $550 to $585. Since 2011, the gap in the share of adults working or looking for work has widened, with this figure now well higher in Nanima.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 149
- First area, 2016: 165
- First area, 2021: 252
- Second area, 2011: 270
- Second area, 2016: 295
- Second area, 2021: 498
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Nanima: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Springrange: 0.0% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Nanima: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Springrange: 1.9% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Nanima: 2.3% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Springrange: 1.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Nanima: 3.9% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Springrange: 3.9% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Nanima: 3.9% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Springrange: 2.5% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Nanima: 1.2% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Springrange: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Nanima: 4.3% males, 6.6% females; 55–59 in Springrange: 4.1% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Nanima: 6.6% males, 5.9% females; 50–54 in Springrange: 2.5% males, 4.3% females
- 45–49 in Nanima: 2.7% males, 6.3% females; 45–49 in Springrange: 6.0% males, 4.8% females
- 40–44 in Nanima: 2.7% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Springrange: 2.1% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Nanima: 1.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Springrange: 2.5% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Nanima: 2.7% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Springrange: 1.4% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Nanima: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Springrange: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Nanima: 2.7% males, 1.2% females; 20–24 in Springrange: 3.3% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Nanima: 5.1% males, 7.0% females; 15–19 in Springrange: 4.3% males, 5.8% females
- 10–14 in Nanima: 3.9% males, 7.8% females; 10–14 in Springrange: 2.5% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Nanima: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Springrange: 2.1% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Nanima: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Springrange: 2.7% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $966
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $1,183
- Second area, 2011: $955
- Second area, 2016: $1,076
- Second area, 2021: $972
- First area, 2011: $2,374
- First area, 2016: $2,874
- First area, 2021: $2,974
- Second area, 2011: $2,025
- Second area, 2016: $2,559
- Second area, 2021: $2,750
- First area, 2011: $3,068
- First area, 2016: $3,125
- First area, 2021: $3,299
- Second area, 2011: $2,386
- Second area, 2016: $2,519
- Second area, 2021: $2,949
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $420
- First area, 2021: $585
- Second area, 2011: $365
- Second area, 2016: $215
- Second area, 2021: $550
- First area, 2011: $5,000
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,550
- Second area, 2011: $1,855
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,958
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Nanima with nearby areas
Compare Springrange with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nanima vs Springrange [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12902/nanima/vs/SAL13641/springrange