Compare
Louisa Creek vs Pikapene
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.3 km apart · Louisa Creek profile · Pikapene profile
Louisa Creek Pikapene
Louisa Creek and Pikapene are both sparsely populated, rural areas in New South Wales. There are stark differences in the people who live there, with the typical resident in Pikapene far older at 59 compared to 45 in Louisa Creek. This age gap is matched by a huge difference in wealth, as the typical weekly personal income in Pikapene is $2,374, while in Louisa Creek it is much lower at $575.
These two neighbours share a very similar landscape, as both are completely car-dependent with no shops, schools, or public transport within walking distance. The gap in typical age and income between the two areas has remained wide over time, while Louisa Creek continues to have a well higher mean terrain slope than Pikapene.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 9
- First area, 2021: 10
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 5
- First area, 2016: 57 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $325
- First area, 2021: $575
- Second area, 2021: $2,374
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Louisa Creek with nearby areas
Compare Pikapene with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Louisa Creek vs Pikapene [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12402/louisa-creek/vs/SAL13215/pikapene