Compare
Deep Creek vs Pikapene
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Deep Creek profile · Pikapene profile
Deep Creek Pikapene
Deep Creek (Clarence Valley - NSW) and Pikapene are both sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. The most striking difference is the age of residents; the typical person in Deep Creek (Clarence Valley - NSW) is just 26, while the typical resident in Pikapene is far older at 59. Typical weekly personal incomes are also well higher in Deep Creek (Clarence Valley - NSW) at $3,250, compared to $2,374 in Pikapene.
These two nearby areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining largely non-residential with very few people. Both are completely car-dependent, with no one living within a 15-minute walk of a park, school, or grocery store. Neither area has any public transport routes or stops, and both are far from the national figure for walkability.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 9
- First area, 2021: 12
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 5
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 26 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Pikapene: 100.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 100.0% females; 5–9 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Deep Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Pikapene: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $3,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,374
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Deep Creek with nearby areas
Compare Pikapene with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Deep Creek vs Pikapene [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11230/deep-creek/vs/SAL13215/pikapene