Compare
Little Forest vs Woodstock
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.6 km apart · Little Forest profile · Woodstock profile
Little Forest Woodstock
Woodstock (Shoalhaven - NSW) and Little Forest are neighbouring areas that differ significantly in their demographics and costs. Little Forest is much older, with 38.9% of people aged 65 and over compared to 26.2% in Woodstock (Shoalhaven - NSW). This higher age profile in Little Forest is alongside a more qualified workforce, where 28.1% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, far higher than the 16.3% in Woodstock (Shoalhaven - NSW). These differences extend to the housing market, where typical weekly rents in Little Forest are far higher at $350, compared to $216 in Woodstock (Shoalhaven - NSW).
Both areas are almost identical in their reliance on cars, as 0.0% of people in either place commute by public transport. They also share similar household structures, with both averaging 2.6 people per home and having about 64% of homes owned outright. While Woodstock (Shoalhaven - NSW) has a higher share of people working or looking for work, Little Forest has a far higher proportion of people working from home at 30.1%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 325
- First area, 2016: 161
- First area, 2021: 185
- Second area, 2011: 257
- Second area, 2016: 253
- Second area, 2021: 248
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 57 yrs
- First area, 2021: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Little Forest: 0.0% males, 2.7% females; 85+ in Woodstock: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Little Forest: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Woodstock: 0.0% males, 2.2% females
- 75–79 in Little Forest: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Woodstock: 0.0% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Little Forest: 4.9% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Woodstock: 4.4% males, 5.7% females
- 65–69 in Little Forest: 6.0% males, 9.8% females; 65–69 in Woodstock: 7.5% males, 5.3% females
- 60–64 in Little Forest: 6.5% males, 7.1% females; 60–64 in Woodstock: 6.2% males, 5.3% females
- 55–59 in Little Forest: 6.0% males, 6.0% females; 55–59 in Woodstock: 5.7% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Little Forest: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 50–54 in Woodstock: 4.4% males, 7.5% females
- 45–49 in Little Forest: 2.7% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Woodstock: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 40–44 in Little Forest: 2.7% males, 1.6% females; 40–44 in Woodstock: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 35–39 in Little Forest: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 35–39 in Woodstock: 0.0% males, 1.3% females
- 30–34 in Little Forest: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Woodstock: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Little Forest: 3.3% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Woodstock: 2.2% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Little Forest: 3.8% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Woodstock: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Little Forest: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Woodstock: 6.6% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Little Forest: 4.9% males, 4.9% females; 10–14 in Woodstock: 4.4% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Little Forest: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Woodstock: 2.6% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Little Forest: 0.0% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Woodstock: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $463
- First area, 2016: $517
- First area, 2021: $619
- Second area, 2011: $531
- Second area, 2016: $601
- Second area, 2021: $614
- First area, 2011: $1,007
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,218
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,375
- Second area, 2021: $1,812
- First area, 2011: $1,187
- First area, 2016: $1,224
- First area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $1,281
- Second area, 2016: $1,416
- Second area, 2021: $1,892
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $290
- First area, 2016: $265
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $60
- Second area, 2016: $120
- Second area, 2021: $216
- First area, 2011: $1,183
- First area, 2016: $1,387
- First area, 2021: $1,434
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,292
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Little Forest with nearby areas
Compare Woodstock with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Little Forest vs Woodstock [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12360/little-forest/vs/SAL14414/woodstock