Compare
Lanitza vs Wells Crossing
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.3 km apart · Lanitza profile · Wells Crossing profile
Lanitza Wells Crossing
Lanitza and Wells Crossing are neighbouring rural areas in the Clarence Valley. Lanitza has a noticeably older population, with a typical age of 49 compared to 45 in Wells Crossing. There is a striking difference among First Nations residents; the typical age in Lanitza is 49, while it is just 22 in Wells Crossing. Lanitza also has higher typical family incomes, at $1,609 per week compared to $1,100 in Wells Crossing, and a higher share of bachelor degrees at 11.7% versus 5.1%.
Both areas are very similar in many ways, including the proportion of people born overseas and those who use another language at home. They also share an almost identical typical weekly rent of around $300. While they are both largely car-dependent, Lanitza has a few more walkable amenities per 1,000 residents. Over time, the gap in typical family income has widened, with Lanitza now earning $509 more per week than Wells Crossing.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 426
- First area, 2016: 297
- First area, 2021: 313
- Second area, 2011: 302
- Second area, 2016: 163
- Second area, 2021: 212
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lanitza: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Wells Crossing: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Lanitza: 1.4% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Lanitza: 1.7% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Lanitza: 4.5% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Lanitza: 4.8% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Wells Crossing: 3.4% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Lanitza: 5.9% males, 4.5% females; 60–64 in Wells Crossing: 4.3% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Lanitza: 6.9% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Wells Crossing: 5.3% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Lanitza: 4.5% males, 4.5% females; 50–54 in Wells Crossing: 5.8% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Lanitza: 5.2% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Wells Crossing: 3.8% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Lanitza: 1.7% males, 2.1% females; 40–44 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Lanitza: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Lanitza: 2.8% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Wells Crossing: 4.3% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Lanitza: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 25–29 in Wells Crossing: 1.9% males, 5.3% females
- 20–24 in Lanitza: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 20–24 in Wells Crossing: 2.4% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Lanitza: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Wells Crossing: 4.8% males, 1.4% females
- 10–14 in Lanitza: 3.8% males, 5.9% females; 10–14 in Wells Crossing: 2.9% males, 6.7% females
- 5–9 in Lanitza: 2.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Lanitza: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $310
- First area, 2016: $434
- First area, 2021: $544
- Second area, 2011: $373
- Second area, 2016: $431
- Second area, 2021: $460
- First area, 2011: $734
- First area, 2016: $1,021
- First area, 2021: $1,202
- Second area, 2011: $756
- Second area, 2016: $880
- Second area, 2021: $1,016
- First area, 2011: $841
- First area, 2016: $1,176
- First area, 2021: $1,609
- Second area, 2011: $769
- Second area, 2016: $1,042
- Second area, 2021: $1,100
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $200
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $313
- Second area, 2011: $210
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $975
- First area, 2016: $1,400
- First area, 2021: $1,473
- Second area, 2011: $1,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,246
- Second area, 2021: $1,053
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lanitza with nearby areas
Compare Wells Crossing with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lanitza vs Wells Crossing [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL12279/lanitza/vs/SAL14240/wells-crossing