Compare
Calamia vs Wells Crossing
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Calamia profile · Wells Crossing profile
Calamia Wells Crossing
Wells Crossing and Calamia are two nearby rural areas in New South Wales. Wells Crossing is larger and more diverse, with 17.0% of its people being children under 15 and 11.3% born overseas. In contrast, Calamia is sparsely populated and has no children or people born overseas. There are also notable differences in health and wealth; long-term health conditions are far higher in Calamia, where 50.0% of residents have one, while typical weekly family income is far higher in Wells Crossing at $1,100 compared to $575 in Calamia.
Both areas have a similar number of people per home, which sits around the national figure. They are also alike in that they are both car-dependent and have no residents who speak little or no English. While they share similar typical weekly personal incomes of around $460, the two areas have tracked differently since 2011. The gap in population mobility has widened, as 27.0% of Wells Crossing residents moved in the last five years, while no one in Calamia did.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 13
- First area, 2021: 24
- Second area, 2011: 302
- Second area, 2016: 163
- Second area, 2021: 212
- First area, 2016: 55 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Wells Crossing: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Wells Crossing: 3.4% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Calamia: 41.7% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Wells Crossing: 4.3% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 25.0% females; 55–59 in Wells Crossing: 5.3% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Wells Crossing: 5.8% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 33.3% females; 45–49 in Wells Crossing: 3.8% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Wells Crossing: 4.3% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Wells Crossing: 1.9% males, 5.3% females
- 20–24 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Wells Crossing: 2.4% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Wells Crossing: 4.8% males, 1.4% females
- 10–14 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Wells Crossing: 2.9% males, 6.7% females
- 5–9 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Calamia: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Wells Crossing: 1.4% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $462
- Second area, 2011: $373
- Second area, 2016: $431
- Second area, 2021: $460
- First area, 2016: $700
- First area, 2021: $900
- Second area, 2011: $756
- Second area, 2016: $880
- Second area, 2021: $1,016
- First area, 2021: $575
- Second area, 2011: $769
- Second area, 2016: $1,042
- Second area, 2021: $1,100
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 1.0
- First area, 2021: 1.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: $210
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $1,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,246
- Second area, 2021: $1,053
- First area, 2016: 0.30
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Calamia with nearby areas
Compare Wells Crossing with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Calamia vs Wells Crossing [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10748/calamia/vs/SAL14240/wells-crossing