Compare
Gilmore vs Tumut
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Gilmore profile · Tumut profile
Gilmore Tumut
Tumut and Gilmore (NSW) are nearby areas with very different layouts. Tumut is a more urban hub where 31.7% of people live alone and 32.0% rent their homes, while Gilmore (NSW) is a sparsely populated area where everyone lives in a separate house and 93.5% of homes have three or more bedrooms. Tumut is somewhat walkable, with many residents living within a 15-minute walk of schools and shops, whereas Gilmore (NSW) is car-dependent. Work patterns also differ, as 24.1% of people in Gilmore (NSW) work from home, compared to just 5.1% in Tumut.
Both areas have almost identical rates of full-time employment, sitting at around 59%. They also share similar unemployment rates and school advantage scores. While Tumut has more people working or looking for work, and more renters, the two areas have tracked similarly in their general employment levels over time. In Gilmore (NSW), a higher share of adults are working or looking for work (71.3%) than in Tumut (56.1%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 249
- First area, 2016: 177
- First area, 2021: 229
- Second area, 2011: 6,238
- Second area, 2016: 6,230
- Second area, 2021: 6,613
- First area, 2011: 49 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gilmore: 0.0% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Tumut: 1.0% males, 2.0% females
- 80–84 in Gilmore: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Tumut: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Gilmore: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 75–79 in Tumut: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Gilmore: 4.0% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Tumut: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Gilmore: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 65–69 in Tumut: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Gilmore: 6.2% males, 6.7% females; 60–64 in Tumut: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Gilmore: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 55–59 in Tumut: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Gilmore: 2.7% males, 1.3% females; 50–54 in Tumut: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Gilmore: 2.2% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Tumut: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Gilmore: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Tumut: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Gilmore: 0.0% males, 4.4% females; 35–39 in Tumut: 2.6% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Gilmore: 1.3% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Tumut: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Gilmore: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Tumut: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Gilmore: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Tumut: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Gilmore: 2.2% males, 1.3% females; 15–19 in Tumut: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Gilmore: 4.4% males, 5.8% females; 10–14 in Tumut: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Gilmore: 7.1% males, 4.0% females; 5–9 in Tumut: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Gilmore: 3.6% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Tumut: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $593
- First area, 2016: $843
- First area, 2021: $884
- Second area, 2011: $466
- Second area, 2016: $552
- Second area, 2021: $655
- First area, 2011: $1,197
- First area, 2016: $1,850
- First area, 2021: $1,771
- Second area, 2011: $918
- Second area, 2016: $1,073
- Second area, 2021: $1,242
- First area, 2011: $1,399
- First area, 2016: $2,125
- First area, 2021: $1,937
- Second area, 2011: $1,197
- Second area, 2016: $1,388
- Second area, 2021: $1,613
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $95
- First area, 2016: $150
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $245
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,820
- Second area, 2011: $1,408
- Second area, 2016: $1,361
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Gilmore with nearby areas
Compare Tumut with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gilmore vs Tumut [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11630/gilmore/vs/SAL13984/tumut