Compare
Farley vs Rutherford
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.0 km apart · Farley profile · Rutherford profile
Farley Rutherford
Rutherford and Farley are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with very different layouts. Rutherford is a larger hub with a typical resident age of 35 and a walkability score of 5.8 (somewhat walkable), where 92.8% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport. In contrast, Farley is sparsely populated and car-dependent, with a walkability score of 0.5; only 1.6% of homes are within a short walk of transport. Education levels also differ, with Year 12 completion far higher in Farley at 46.3% compared to 35.1% in Rutherford.
Both areas share a similar family makeup, with about 22% of their populations being children under 15 and an equal typical home size of 2.6 people. This common ground exists alongside a stark divide in infrastructure. While Rutherford has far more public transport stops and amenity types within a 15-minute walk, Farley is much more likely to be a rental area, with 50.2% of households renting compared to 33.8% in Rutherford.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 236
- First area, 2016: 218
- First area, 2021: 605
- Second area, 2011: 10,182
- Second area, 2016: 11,884
- Second area, 2021: 13,091
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Farley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Rutherford: 0.8% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Farley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Rutherford: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Farley: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Rutherford: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Farley: 1.0% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Rutherford: 2.1% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Farley: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Rutherford: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Farley: 1.9% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Rutherford: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Farley: 2.5% males, 2.0% females; 55–59 in Rutherford: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Farley: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Rutherford: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Farley: 1.7% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Rutherford: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Farley: 3.4% males, 1.9% females; 40–44 in Rutherford: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Farley: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 35–39 in Rutherford: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Farley: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Rutherford: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Farley: 5.6% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Rutherford: 4.1% males, 4.3% females
- 20–24 in Farley: 4.6% males, 6.3% females; 20–24 in Rutherford: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Farley: 4.9% males, 0.8% females; 15–19 in Rutherford: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Farley: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Rutherford: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Farley: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Rutherford: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Farley: 5.4% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Rutherford: 4.0% males, 3.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $454
- First area, 2016: $639
- First area, 2021: $912
- Second area, 2011: $514
- Second area, 2016: $564
- Second area, 2021: $711
- First area, 2011: $1,275
- First area, 2016: $1,895
- First area, 2021: $2,015
- Second area, 2011: $1,163
- Second area, 2016: $1,202
- Second area, 2021: $1,475
- First area, 2011: $1,218
- First area, 2016: $2,055
- First area, 2021: $2,137
- Second area, 2011: $1,353
- Second area, 2016: $1,389
- Second area, 2021: $1,774
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $335
- First area, 2021: $440
- Second area, 2011: $260
- Second area, 2016: $310
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $2,192
- First area, 2016: $2,113
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,700
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Farley with nearby areas
Compare Rutherford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Farley vs Rutherford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11493/farley/vs/SAL13464/rutherford