Compare
Edgecliff vs Point Piper
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.0 km apart · Edgecliff profile · Point Piper profile
Edgecliff Point Piper
Edgecliff and Point Piper are neighbouring areas with very different living patterns. Point Piper is much wealthier and older, with a typical resident aged 52 and a typical weekly household income of $4,530. It is dominated by larger homes, where 63.9% have three or more bedrooms and 50.4% are owned outright. In contrast, Edgecliff is more transient and urban; 50.3% of homes are rented, 42.1% of people live alone, and the typical resident is younger at 39.
Both areas share a similar proportion of children under 15 and a nearly identical share of people working from home. This commonality exists alongside a stark divide in accessibility. Edgecliff is a walker's paradise with a score of 9.5, where every home is within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services. Point Piper is only somewhat walkable with a score of 5.2, and only 15.2% of homes are within a short walk of a grocery store.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,981
- First area, 2016: 2,580
- First area, 2021: 2,499
- Second area, 2011: 1,404
- Second area, 2016: 1,424
- Second area, 2021: 1,334
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Edgecliff: 1.9% males, 3.1% females; 85+ in Point Piper: 1.7% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Edgecliff: 1.2% males, 2.0% females; 80–84 in Point Piper: 2.0% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Edgecliff: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 75–79 in Point Piper: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 70–74 in Edgecliff: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Point Piper: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 65–69 in Edgecliff: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Point Piper: 4.4% males, 4.8% females
- 60–64 in Edgecliff: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Point Piper: 2.9% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Edgecliff: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Point Piper: 3.4% males, 4.2% females
- 50–54 in Edgecliff: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Point Piper: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Edgecliff: 2.4% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Point Piper: 2.3% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Edgecliff: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Point Piper: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 35–39 in Edgecliff: 4.4% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Point Piper: 2.6% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Edgecliff: 4.9% males, 6.0% females; 30–34 in Point Piper: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Edgecliff: 4.6% males, 5.9% females; 25–29 in Point Piper: 1.9% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Edgecliff: 2.0% males, 3.7% females; 20–24 in Point Piper: 2.9% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Edgecliff: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Point Piper: 2.6% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Edgecliff: 1.5% males, 2.0% females; 10–14 in Point Piper: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 5–9 in Edgecliff: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Point Piper: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 0–4 in Edgecliff: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Point Piper: 2.0% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,176
- First area, 2016: $1,365
- First area, 2021: $1,510
- Second area, 2011: $1,370
- Second area, 2016: $1,708
- Second area, 2021: $1,835
- First area, 2011: $1,783
- First area, 2016: $2,198
- First area, 2021: $2,321
- Second area, 2011: $2,680
- Second area, 2016: $3,644
- Second area, 2021: $4,530
- First area, 2011: $2,680
- First area, 2016: $3,245
- First area, 2021: $3,756
- Second area, 2011: $3,005
- Second area, 2016: $4,305
- Second area, 2021: $4,921
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.8
- First area, 2016: 1.9
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $500
- First area, 2016: $600
- First area, 2021: $600
- Second area, 2011: $750
- Second area, 2016: $850
- Second area, 2021: $900
- First area, 2011: $2,817
- First area, 2016: $3,027
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $4,067
- Second area, 2016: $4,000
- Second area, 2021: $5,000
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Edgecliff with nearby areas
Compare Point Piper with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Edgecliff vs Point Piper [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11382/edgecliff/vs/SAL13245/point-piper