Compare
Curricabark vs Mernot
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Curricabark profile · Mernot profile
Curricabark Mernot
Curricabark and Mernot are both sparsely populated, non-residential areas. Curricabark has a population of only 8 people, while Mernot has no residents. Mernot has a much steeper average terrain slope at 20.7%, compared to 10.5% in Curricabark. In Mernot, 33.3% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, which is far higher than the 0.0% recorded for Curricabark.
Both areas are entirely car-dependent and lack basic local services. Neither place has any homes within a 15-minute walk of schools, groceries, or health services. This shared lack of infrastructure is consistent across both locations, as neither area provides any residents with a 15-minute-city walkshed.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 11
- First area, 2021: 8
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 58 yrs
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $575
- First area, 2021: $900
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.80
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare Curricabark with nearby areas
Compare Mernot with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Curricabark vs Mernot [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11181/curricabark/vs/SAL12588/mernot