Compare
Claymore vs Eschol Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Claymore profile · Eschol Park profile
Claymore Eschol Park
Eschol Park and Claymore are neighbouring areas in Campbelltown, but they differ sharply in income and housing. Typical weekly household income is far higher in Eschol Park at $1,851, compared to $1,020 in Claymore. This is reflected in their housing; 94% of homes in Eschol Park are separate houses, and 27.5% are owned outright. In contrast, 70.6% of Claymore homes are rented, and many more residents there are without a motor vehicle. Claymore is also much younger, with children under 15 making up 31.8% of the population, compared to 21.4% in Eschol Park.
These two areas have tracked in opposite directions since 2011, with the gaps in income and home ownership widening. Despite these diverging trends, they still share several common traits. Both have about the same proportion of adults with a bachelor degree (around 14%) and very similar numbers of people per home. Most residents in both areas live within a 15-minute walk of a park, and both are roughly the same distance from the city.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,308
- First area, 2016: 2,644
- First area, 2021: 2,579
- Second area, 2011: 2,656
- Second area, 2016: 2,582
- Second area, 2021: 2,607
- First area, 2011: 20 yrs
- First area, 2016: 23 yrs
- First area, 2021: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Claymore: 0.0% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Eschol Park: 0.1% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Claymore: 0.1% males, 0.2% females; 80–84 in Eschol Park: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Claymore: 0.4% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Eschol Park: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Claymore: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in Eschol Park: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Claymore: 0.9% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Eschol Park: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Claymore: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 60–64 in Eschol Park: 3.1% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Claymore: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 55–59 in Eschol Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Claymore: 1.7% males, 2.3% females; 50–54 in Eschol Park: 2.4% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Claymore: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Eschol Park: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Claymore: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Eschol Park: 3.4% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Claymore: 3.9% males, 5.4% females; 35–39 in Eschol Park: 4.5% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Claymore: 2.3% males, 5.0% females; 30–34 in Eschol Park: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Claymore: 2.5% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Eschol Park: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 20–24 in Claymore: 2.9% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in Eschol Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Claymore: 4.4% males, 3.9% females; 15–19 in Eschol Park: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Claymore: 6.0% males, 4.8% females; 10–14 in Eschol Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Claymore: 5.3% males, 5.3% females; 5–9 in Eschol Park: 3.5% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Claymore: 4.8% males, 5.7% females; 0–4 in Eschol Park: 4.1% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $321
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $483
- Second area, 2011: $643
- Second area, 2016: $741
- Second area, 2021: $820
- First area, 2011: $588
- First area, 2016: $698
- First area, 2021: $1,020
- Second area, 2011: $1,522
- Second area, 2016: $1,649
- Second area, 2021: $1,851
- First area, 2011: $639
- First area, 2016: $758
- First area, 2021: $1,211
- Second area, 2011: $1,611
- Second area, 2016: $1,743
- Second area, 2021: $2,019
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.5
- First area, 2016: 3.3
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $160
- First area, 2016: $199
- First area, 2021: $209
- Second area, 2011: $310
- Second area, 2016: $390
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $477
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,770
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,842
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Claymore with nearby areas
Compare Eschol Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Claymore vs Eschol Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10923/claymore/vs/SAL11444/eschol-park