Compare
Chisholm vs Phoenix Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.4 km apart · Chisholm profile · Phoenix Park profile
Chisholm Phoenix Park
Chisholm (NSW) and Phoenix Park are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Chisholm (NSW) is a larger, younger community where the typical resident is 32, while Phoenix Park is sparsely populated and far older, with a typical age of 50. Chisholm (NSW) is wealthier, with a typical household income of $2,755 per week compared to $1,416 in Phoenix Park. It is also more diverse and mobile, with 15.6% of people born overseas and 75.4% moving in during the last five years, whereas Phoenix Park has only 3.9% born overseas and just 13.2% of residents arriving recently.
Both areas are almost identical in their housing style, with nearly every home being a separate detached house. They also share similar proportions of people who have served in the Defence Force and a similar percentage of First Nations residents. While they share these foundations, their current paths differ: Phoenix Park has a much higher share of homes owned outright at 54.8%, while Chisholm (NSW) sees more renting and mortgage repayments.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 184
- First area, 2016: 1,461
- First area, 2021: 4,577
- Second area, 2016: 95
- Second area, 2021: 77
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 31 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 3.6% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.3% males, 0.1% females; 80–84 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in Phoenix Park: 3.6% males, 7.2% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Phoenix Park: 3.6% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Phoenix Park: 7.2% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 55–59 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Phoenix Park: 10.8% males, 6.0% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Phoenix Park: 6.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 6.0% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 5.4% males, 5.7% females; 35–39 in Phoenix Park: 3.6% males, 4.8% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 4.6% males, 5.2% females; 30–34 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 4.8% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 6.0% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.1% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Phoenix Park: 7.2% males, 7.2% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 5.1% males, 5.0% females; 5–9 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 4.8% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 0–4 in Phoenix Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $807
- First area, 2016: $931
- First area, 2021: $1,164
- Second area, 2016: $479
- Second area, 2021: $840
- First area, 2011: $2,457
- First area, 2016: $2,295
- First area, 2021: $2,755
- Second area, 2016: $1,166
- Second area, 2021: $1,416
- First area, 2011: $2,125
- First area, 2016: $2,306
- First area, 2021: $2,796
- Second area, 2016: $1,437
- Second area, 2021: $1,458
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $463
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2016: $100
- Second area, 2021: $470
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,332
- First area, 2021: $2,344
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,800
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Phoenix Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Phoenix Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10908/chisholm/vs/SAL13206/phoenix-park