Compare
Chisholm vs Metford
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Chisholm profile · Metford profile
Chisholm Metford
Metford and Chisholm (NSW) are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes, but they differ sharply in wealth and education. Chisholm (NSW) has a far higher share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher (26.2% compared to 9.9% in Metford) and a typical weekly household income that is far higher at $2,755, compared to $1,484 in Metford. Metford is more likely to have one-parent families (22.2% versus 5.5%) and a higher share of people living alone (24.4% compared to 6.6%).
Both areas share almost identical levels of volunteering and a similar proportion of people in de facto relationships. While Chisholm (NSW) is more likely to have large, owner-occupied detached houses, Metford offers more convenience with far more public transport stops and a higher share of homes within a 10-minute walk of a station. The gap in mobility is striking, with 75.4% of Chisholm (NSW) residents having moved in the last five years, compared to 34.5% in Metford.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 184
- First area, 2016: 1,461
- First area, 2021: 4,577
- Second area, 2011: 4,872
- Second area, 2016: 4,764
- Second area, 2021: 4,707
- First area, 2011: 47 yrs
- First area, 2016: 31 yrs
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 0.1% males, 0.1% females; 85+ in Metford: 0.3% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 0.3% males, 0.1% females; 80–84 in Metford: 0.4% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Metford: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in Metford: 2.1% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 65–69 in Metford: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Metford: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 55–59 in Metford: 3.0% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Metford: 2.8% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Metford: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Metford: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 5.4% males, 5.7% females; 35–39 in Metford: 3.1% males, 3.7% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 4.6% males, 5.2% females; 30–34 in Metford: 3.7% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 3.2% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Metford: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Metford: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Metford: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 4.1% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Metford: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 5.1% males, 5.0% females; 5–9 in Metford: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 0–4 in Metford: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $807
- First area, 2016: $931
- First area, 2021: $1,164
- Second area, 2011: $534
- Second area, 2016: $580
- Second area, 2021: $731
- First area, 2011: $2,457
- First area, 2016: $2,295
- First area, 2021: $2,755
- Second area, 2011: $1,170
- Second area, 2016: $1,217
- Second area, 2021: $1,484
- First area, 2011: $2,125
- First area, 2016: $2,306
- First area, 2021: $2,796
- Second area, 2011: $1,267
- Second area, 2016: $1,423
- Second area, 2021: $1,751
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $463
- First area, 2021: $550
- Second area, 2011: $260
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,332
- First area, 2021: $2,344
- Second area, 2011: $1,670
- Second area, 2016: $1,570
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Metford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Metford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10908/chisholm/vs/SAL12603/metford