Compare
Cedar Brush Creek vs Dooralong
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Cedar Brush Creek profile · Dooralong profile
Cedar Brush Creek Dooralong
Dooralong and Cedar Brush Creek are nearby areas in New South Wales with distinct living patterns. Dooralong has more large homes, with 90.9% having three or more bedrooms, and a typical weekly rent that is far higher at $500 compared to $275 in Cedar Brush Creek. Dooralong also offers more accessibility, with far more public transport stops and homes within walking distance of parks and transit, while Cedar Brush Creek has no public transport stops or walkable amenities.
Both areas share a nearly identical proportion of children under 15, at around 17%. They also have the same number of First Nations residents and the same rate of detached houses. While they share these traits, other gaps remain, such as Cedar Brush Creek having a far higher share of people with no religion at 46.4% compared to 36.0% in Dooralong. Residents in Cedar Brush Creek are also noticeably older, with a typical age of 46 compared to 42 in Dooralong.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 114
- First area, 2021: 125
- Second area, 2011: 385
- Second area, 2016: 362
- Second area, 2021: 350
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Dooralong: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Dooralong: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Cedar Brush Creek: 3.2% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Dooralong: 2.4% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Dooralong: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Cedar Brush Creek: 5.3% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Dooralong: 1.5% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Cedar Brush Creek: 7.4% males, 6.4% females; 60–64 in Dooralong: 3.5% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Dooralong: 6.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Cedar Brush Creek: 7.4% males, 7.4% females; 50–54 in Dooralong: 4.1% males, 5.6% females
- 45–49 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 7.4% females; 45–49 in Dooralong: 3.2% males, 5.9% females
- 40–44 in Cedar Brush Creek: 5.3% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Dooralong: 2.6% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Cedar Brush Creek: 5.3% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Dooralong: 2.6% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Dooralong: 2.6% males, 1.2% females
- 25–29 in Cedar Brush Creek: 3.2% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Dooralong: 2.6% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Dooralong: 3.5% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Cedar Brush Creek: 3.2% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Dooralong: 5.0% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Cedar Brush Creek: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Dooralong: 5.0% males, 5.9% females
- 5–9 in Cedar Brush Creek: 5.3% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Dooralong: 2.6% males, 1.5% females
- 0–4 in Cedar Brush Creek: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Dooralong: 0.9% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $718
- First area, 2021: $1,015
- Second area, 2011: $680
- Second area, 2016: $487
- Second area, 2021: $806
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $2,250
- Second area, 2011: $1,437
- Second area, 2016: $1,724
- Second area, 2021: $2,833
- First area, 2016: $2,541
- First area, 2021: $2,833
- Second area, 2011: $1,488
- Second area, 2016: $2,047
- Second area, 2021: $2,770
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $150
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $3,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,583
- Second area, 2016: $2,817
- Second area, 2021: $2,947
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cedar Brush Creek with nearby areas
Compare Dooralong with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cedar Brush Creek vs Dooralong [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10866/cedar-brush-creek/vs/SAL11278/dooralong