Compare
Boxers Creek vs Run-o-Waters
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Boxers Creek profile · Run-o-Waters profile
Boxers Creek Run-o-Waters
Run-o-Waters and Boxers Creek are nearby rural areas in New South Wales with very different profiles. Run-o-Waters has a more highly qualified population, with 18.5% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 6.5% in Boxers Creek. Earnings are also far higher in Run-o-Waters, where the typical weekly household income is $2,229, while the typical figure in Boxers Creek is $1,458. This is reflected in the housing, where 100% of homes in Run-o-Waters have three or more bedrooms, compared to 71.1% in Boxers Creek.
These two areas have tracked against each other since 2011 as Run-o-Waters becomes increasingly more mobile, with 46.9% of people moving in the last five years. They do share some basics, such as having an equal share of children under 15 and only using detached houses. In both places, no one commutes by public transport and the unemployment rate is very low, sitting at or near 0%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 226
- First area, 2021: 259
- Second area, 2011: 388
- Second area, 2016: 471
- Second area, 2021: 605
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Boxers Creek: 1.2% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Run-o-Waters: 0.5% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Boxers Creek: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Run-o-Waters: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Boxers Creek: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Run-o-Waters: 2.3% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Boxers Creek: 4.3% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Run-o-Waters: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Boxers Creek: 1.2% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Run-o-Waters: 5.3% males, 6.5% females
- 60–64 in Boxers Creek: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Run-o-Waters: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Boxers Creek: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Run-o-Waters: 3.2% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Boxers Creek: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Run-o-Waters: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Boxers Creek: 5.8% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Run-o-Waters: 3.0% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Boxers Creek: 3.5% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Run-o-Waters: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Boxers Creek: 3.5% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Run-o-Waters: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Boxers Creek: 0.0% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Run-o-Waters: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 25–29 in Boxers Creek: 0.0% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Run-o-Waters: 2.2% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Boxers Creek: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Run-o-Waters: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Boxers Creek: 4.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Run-o-Waters: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Boxers Creek: 2.3% males, 5.4% females; 10–14 in Run-o-Waters: 4.7% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Boxers Creek: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Run-o-Waters: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Boxers Creek: 1.9% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Run-o-Waters: 2.5% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $575
- First area, 2021: $655
- Second area, 2011: $697
- Second area, 2016: $748
- Second area, 2021: $881
- First area, 2016: $1,194
- First area, 2021: $1,458
- Second area, 2011: $1,735
- Second area, 2016: $1,843
- Second area, 2021: $2,229
- First area, 2016: $1,583
- First area, 2021: $1,531
- Second area, 2011: $1,525
- Second area, 2016: $1,920
- Second area, 2021: $2,358
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $263
- Second area, 2021: $475
- First area, 2016: $1,907
- First area, 2021: $1,682
- Second area, 2011: $1,559
- Second area, 2016: $2,059
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Boxers Creek with nearby areas
Compare Run-o-Waters with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Boxers Creek vs Run-o-Waters [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10538/boxers-creek/vs/SAL13455/run-o-waters