Compare
Goulburn vs Run-o-Waters
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 5.2 km apart · Goulburn profile · Run-o-Waters profile
Goulburn Run-o-Waters
Goulburn and Run-o-Waters are neighbouring areas with very different living patterns. Goulburn is more urban and accessible, with a walkability score of 4.9 (somewhat walkable) and 34.0% of homes being rented. In contrast, Run-o-Waters is car-dependent, with a walkability score of 0.4 and a much higher share of homeowners, including 46.8% who own their home outright. Wealth is also higher in Run-o-Waters, where 31.3% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, compared to 14.4% in Goulburn.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, maintaining a shared profile in terms of full-time employment and the number of children under 15. They also share a similar distance to the city and an almost identical number of people per bedroom. However, Goulburn remains much more diverse, with 16.8% of its residents arriving recently from overseas, while just 2.8% of people in Run-o-Waters have arrived from abroad lately.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 21,092
- First area, 2016: 22,419
- First area, 2021: 23,963
- Second area, 2011: 388
- Second area, 2016: 471
- Second area, 2021: 605
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Goulburn: 1.1% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Run-o-Waters: 0.5% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Goulburn: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Run-o-Waters: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Goulburn: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Run-o-Waters: 2.3% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Goulburn: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Run-o-Waters: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Goulburn: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Run-o-Waters: 5.3% males, 6.5% females
- 60–64 in Goulburn: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Run-o-Waters: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Goulburn: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Run-o-Waters: 3.2% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Goulburn: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Run-o-Waters: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Goulburn: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Run-o-Waters: 3.0% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Goulburn: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Run-o-Waters: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Goulburn: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Run-o-Waters: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Goulburn: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Run-o-Waters: 2.2% males, 1.7% females
- 25–29 in Goulburn: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Run-o-Waters: 2.2% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Goulburn: 3.2% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Run-o-Waters: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Goulburn: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Run-o-Waters: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Goulburn: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Run-o-Waters: 4.7% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Goulburn: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Run-o-Waters: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Goulburn: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Run-o-Waters: 2.5% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $516
- First area, 2016: $625
- First area, 2021: $747
- Second area, 2011: $697
- Second area, 2016: $748
- Second area, 2021: $881
- First area, 2011: $949
- First area, 2016: $1,155
- First area, 2021: $1,405
- Second area, 2011: $1,735
- Second area, 2016: $1,843
- Second area, 2021: $2,229
- First area, 2011: $1,273
- First area, 2016: $1,477
- First area, 2021: $1,899
- Second area, 2011: $1,525
- Second area, 2016: $1,920
- Second area, 2021: $2,358
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $185
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $263
- Second area, 2021: $475
- First area, 2011: $1,482
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,559
- Second area, 2016: $2,059
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Goulburn with nearby areas
Compare Run-o-Waters with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Goulburn vs Run-o-Waters [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11731/goulburn/vs/SAL13455/run-o-waters