Compare
Bolivia vs Forest Land
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Bolivia profile · Forest Land profile
Bolivia Forest Land
Bolivia and Forest Land are both sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. Bolivia has a small population of 74 people, while Forest Land is largely non-residential with no residents. Bolivia is more developed in terms of infrastructure, with two public transport routes and two stops, which is far larger than the zero found in Forest Land. Bolivia also has a steeper landscape, with a mean terrain slope of 8.7% compared to 1.6% in Forest Land.
Everyday life in both places is car-dependent, as both have walkability scores that reflect this. They share a lack of nearby services, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, grocery store, park, or health service. This lack of local amenities is consistent across both areas, regardless of Bolivia's slightly higher number of transport stops.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 66
- First area, 2021: 74
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 61 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $478
- First area, 2021: $575
- First area, 2016: $900
- First area, 2021: $866
- First area, 2016: $933
- First area, 2021: $1,562
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $1,200
- First area, 2021: $1,400
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.60
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Bolivia with nearby areas
Compare Forest Land with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bolivia vs Forest Land [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10446/bolivia/vs/SAL11548/forest-land