Compare
Blue Mountains National Park vs Katoomba
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Blue Mountains National Park profile · Katoomba profile
Blue Mountains National Park Katoomba
Katoomba and Blue Mountains National Park are nearby areas with very different layouts. Katoomba is a residential hub with over 8,000 people, while Blue Mountains National Park is largely non-residential with a population of zero. This results in a stark contrast in livability; Katoomba is very walkable, with 98.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, whereas Blue Mountains National Park is car-dependent. There are also big gaps in income and age, with the typical resident in Blue Mountains National Park being far older (69 years compared to 48 years in Katoomba) and having a far higher typical weekly personal income of $1,625, compared to $649 in Katoomba.
Both areas share a similar average school advantage score. Beyond this, they differ in almost every way, from the number of public transport stops—112 in Katoomba compared to just 3 in the park—to the typical number of people per home, which is far higher in Katoomba. While Katoomba is a connected centre with many residents and services, Blue Mountains National Park remains a sparsely populated natural area.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 22
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 8,016
- Second area, 2016: 7,964
- Second area, 2021: 8,268
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 69 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2011: $533
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $470
- Second area, 2016: $555
- Second area, 2021: $649
- First area, 2011: $700
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $806
- Second area, 2016: $976
- Second area, 2021: $1,171
- First area, 2011: $774
- Second area, 2011: $1,101
- Second area, 2016: $1,335
- Second area, 2021: $1,669
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 1.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: $240
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $1,521
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,600
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.50
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountains National Park with nearby areas
Compare Katoomba with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains National Park vs Katoomba [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10416/blue-mountains-national-park/vs/SAL12085/katoomba