Compare

Blue Mountains National Park vs Hazelbrook

Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Blue Mountains National Park profile · Hazelbrook profile

Blue Mountains National Park Hazelbrook

Blue Mountains National Park and Hazelbrook are nearby areas with very different characters. Blue Mountains National Park is sparsely populated and car-dependent, with a typical resident who is far older at 69. It has a typical weekly personal income far higher than Hazelbrook at $1,625. In contrast, Hazelbrook is a more populated hub that is somewhat walkable, where the typical resident is 41 and homes are far more likely to be near shops and health services.

Everyday life in both places shares a similar level of school advantage. However, their accessibility differs greatly; Hazelbrook has many more people reachable by transit and far more homes within a short walk of a park, school or grocery store. While Blue Mountains National Park has far fewer residents, its typical personal income remains far higher than the usual amount in Hazelbrook.

Where they differ most

Demographics & Identity

Population in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +5,077 larger in Hazelbrook gap widening
0 0th pct 5,077 86th pct
  • First area, 2011: 22
  • First area, 2016: 0
  • First area, 2021: 0
  • Second area, 2011: 4,534
  • Second area, 2016: 4,974
  • Second area, 2021: 5,077
Median age in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +28 yrs older in Blue Mountains National Park gap widening
69 yrs 100th pct 41 yrs 33rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 39 yrs
  • First area, 2021: 69 yrs
  • Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
  • Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
  • Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
4.5% 70th pct
  • First area, 2011: 14.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 2.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 3.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.5%
17.5% 44th pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 11.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 17.5%
19.6% 67th pct
  • First area, 2011: 13.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 22.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 22.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 19.6%
12.8% 55th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 11.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 11.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 12.8%

Ancestry & Birthplace

15.8% 67th pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 16.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 15.8%

Language

6.4% 66th pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 5.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.4%
0.5% 68th pct
  • Second area, 2016: 0.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.5%

Religion

50.9% 81st pct
  • First area, 2011: 59.1%
  • Second area, 2011: 30.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 39.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 50.9%

Education & Qualifications

61.1% 81st pct
  • Second area, 2011: 54.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 57.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 61.1%
29.4% 85th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 22.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 29.4%
3.02 43rd pct
Schools ≤3 km in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +34 more in Blue Mountains National Park
39 90th pct 5 73rd pct
Avg size in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +130 larger in Blue Mountains National Park
329 51st pct 199 37th pct
ICSEA in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +6 higher in Blue Mountains National Park
1,058 81st pct 1,051 79th pct

Income

Personal income in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +$823 higher in Blue Mountains National Park gap widening
$1,625 100th pct $802 59th pct
  • First area, 2011: $533
  • First area, 2021: $1,625
  • Second area, 2011: $588
  • Second area, 2016: $678
  • Second area, 2021: $802
Household income in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +$169 higher in Hazelbrook gap narrowing
$1,625 56th pct $1,794 65th pct
  • First area, 2011: $700
  • First area, 2021: $1,625
  • Second area, 2011: $1,247
  • Second area, 2016: $1,496
  • Second area, 2021: $1,794
$2,145 66th pct
  • First area, 2011: $774
  • Second area, 2011: $1,530
  • Second area, 2016: $1,799
  • Second area, 2021: $2,145
11.8% 69th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 3.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 11.8%
21.8% 66th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 6.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 10.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 21.8%

Health & Disability

35.0% 78th pct
13.3% 88th pct
6.2% 68th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 4.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.2%

Community Participation

18.6% 53rd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 23.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 18.6%
15.4% 75th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 13.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 14.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 15.4%
29.7% 72nd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 35.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 34.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 29.7%
3.0% 56th pct
28.9% 74th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 28.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 26.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 28.9%

First Nations

First Nations people in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +226 larger in Hazelbrook
0 0th pct 226 86th pct
20 yrs 25th pct
52.3% 75th pct
3.3% 23rd pct
$774 63rd pct
$2,236 71st pct
6.6% 64th pct

Family & Households

Household size in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +1.6 larger in Hazelbrook gap widening
1.0 0th pct 2.6 57th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.0
  • First area, 2021: 1.0
  • Second area, 2011: 2.6
  • Second area, 2016: 2.6
  • Second area, 2021: 2.6
14.1% 68th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 14.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 14.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 14.1%
24.1% 51st pct
  • Second area, 2011: 24.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 25.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 24.1%

Housing & Dwellings

$400 82nd pct
  • Second area, 2011: $280
  • Second area, 2016: $350
  • Second area, 2021: $400
$1,950 69th pct
  • Second area, 2011: $1,780
  • Second area, 2016: $1,733
  • Second area, 2021: $1,950
People / bedroom in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +0.30 higher in Hazelbrook gap widening
0.50 0th pct 0.80 43rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.00
  • First area, 2021: 0.50
  • Second area, 2011: 1.10
  • Second area, 2016: 0.80
  • Second area, 2021: 0.80
14.8% 44th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 17.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 14.8%
36.4% 37th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 32.4%
  • Second area, 2016: 35.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 36.4%
96.5% 51st pct
  • Second area, 2011: 96.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 97.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 96.5%
84.9% 65th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 83.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 84.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 84.9%

Transport & Vehicles

4.3% 70th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 6.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.3%
33.4% 86th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 5.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 33.4%
1.6% 77th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 8.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 8.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 1.6%
PT stops in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +25 more in Hazelbrook
3 72nd pct 28 86th pct
5.52 80th pct
419.5 77th pct
PT routes in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +1 more in Hazelbrook
4 82nd pct 5 86th pct
5 32nd pct
61 45th pct
Reach 30 min in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +11,445 more in Hazelbrook
0 0th pct 11,445 61st pct
Reach 45 min in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +17,873 more in Hazelbrook
0 0th pct 17,873 47th pct

Migration & Movement

28.7% 42nd pct
  • Second area, 2011: 33.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 31.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 28.7%
3.2% 36th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 6.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.2%

Jobs & Industry

4.0% 57th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 4.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 4.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.0%
62.0% 55th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 64.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 63.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 62.0%
54.1% 29th pct
  • Second area, 2011: 60.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 57.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 54.1%

Walkability

Walk score in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +4.9 higher in Hazelbrook
0.7 57th pct 5.6 86th pct
Types ≤15 min in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +5.0 more in Hazelbrook
0.6 54th pct 5.7 86th pct
15-min city in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +58.6 pts higher in Hazelbrook
1.4% 58th pct 60.0% 82nd pct
Walk to shops in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +57.9 pts higher in Hazelbrook
0.7% 58th pct 58.6% 82nd pct
Walk to transit in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +67.5 pts higher in Hazelbrook
13.3% 61st pct 80.8% 82nd pct
Walk to school in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +75.2 pts higher in Hazelbrook
6.3% 59th pct 81.5% 86th pct
Walk to a park in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +77.1 pts higher in Hazelbrook
21.7% 54th pct 98.8% 85th pct
Walk to health in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +54.9 pts higher in Hazelbrook
2.1% 72nd pct 57.0% 86th pct
22.5 65th pct
Intersections/km² in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +37 higher in Hazelbrook
1 44th pct 38 76th pct
Mean slope in Blue Mountains National Parkin Hazelbrook +3.5 pts higher in Blue Mountains National Park
15.0% 92nd pct 11.5% 86th pct

Compare Blue Mountains National Park with nearby areas

Compare Hazelbrook with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains National Park vs Hazelbrook [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10416/blue-mountains-national-park/vs/SAL11888/hazelbrook