Compare
Blue Mountains National Park vs Hazelbrook
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Blue Mountains National Park profile · Hazelbrook profile
Blue Mountains National Park Hazelbrook
Blue Mountains National Park and Hazelbrook are nearby areas with very different characters. Blue Mountains National Park is sparsely populated and car-dependent, with a typical resident who is far older at 69. It has a typical weekly personal income far higher than Hazelbrook at $1,625. In contrast, Hazelbrook is a more populated hub that is somewhat walkable, where the typical resident is 41 and homes are far more likely to be near shops and health services.
Everyday life in both places shares a similar level of school advantage. However, their accessibility differs greatly; Hazelbrook has many more people reachable by transit and far more homes within a short walk of a park, school or grocery store. While Blue Mountains National Park has far fewer residents, its typical personal income remains far higher than the usual amount in Hazelbrook.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 22
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 4,534
- Second area, 2016: 4,974
- Second area, 2021: 5,077
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 69 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2011: $533
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $588
- Second area, 2016: $678
- Second area, 2021: $802
- First area, 2011: $700
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,247
- Second area, 2016: $1,496
- Second area, 2021: $1,794
- First area, 2011: $774
- Second area, 2011: $1,530
- Second area, 2016: $1,799
- Second area, 2021: $2,145
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 1.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $1,780
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,950
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.50
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountains National Park with nearby areas
Compare Hazelbrook with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains National Park vs Hazelbrook [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10416/blue-mountains-national-park/vs/SAL11888/hazelbrook