Compare
Belimbla Park vs Mount Hunter
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.7 km apart · Belimbla Park profile · Mount Hunter profile
Belimbla Park Mount Hunter
Mount Hunter and Belimbla Park are neighbouring areas in New South Wales with similar population sizes. The two places differ most in their local amenities and layout; Belimbla Park is far more connected with more street intersections and 65.8% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to 45.9% in Mount Hunter. Conversely, Mount Hunter is far better served for education, with 29.7% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, while Belimbla Park has none. Mount Hunter also has a far higher typical First Nations household income of $3,083, compared to $1,375 in Belimbla Park.
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of people with a long-term health condition, with Mount Hunter at 25.2% and Belimbla Park at 31.3%. They are otherwise very alike in their core demographics, including a typical resident age of 39 and almost identical typical weekly household incomes of around $2,200. The gap in employment is noticeable, with Belimbla Park having a well higher share of people employed full-time at 55.6%, compared to 48.2% in Mount Hunter.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 547
- First area, 2016: 581
- First area, 2021: 576
- Second area, 2011: 807
- Second area, 2016: 732
- Second area, 2021: 749
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Belimbla Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Hunter: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Belimbla Park: 0.5% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Mount Hunter: 0.4% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Belimbla Park: 1.2% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Mount Hunter: 1.4% males, 0.8% females
- 70–74 in Belimbla Park: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Mount Hunter: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Belimbla Park: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Mount Hunter: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Belimbla Park: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 60–64 in Mount Hunter: 3.6% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Belimbla Park: 2.4% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Mount Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Belimbla Park: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Mount Hunter: 3.9% males, 2.4% females
- 45–49 in Belimbla Park: 4.1% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Mount Hunter: 2.8% males, 4.5% females
- 40–44 in Belimbla Park: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Mount Hunter: 3.8% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Belimbla Park: 3.3% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Mount Hunter: 3.4% males, 2.3% females
- 30–34 in Belimbla Park: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Hunter: 2.4% males, 3.4% females
- 25–29 in Belimbla Park: 2.2% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Mount Hunter: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Belimbla Park: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Mount Hunter: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Belimbla Park: 4.6% males, 4.3% females; 15–19 in Mount Hunter: 5.1% males, 5.1% females
- 10–14 in Belimbla Park: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Mount Hunter: 4.2% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Belimbla Park: 4.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Mount Hunter: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Belimbla Park: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Mount Hunter: 5.4% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $610
- First area, 2016: $732
- First area, 2021: $789
- Second area, 2011: $627
- Second area, 2016: $736
- Second area, 2021: $802
- First area, 2011: $1,676
- First area, 2016: $1,980
- First area, 2021: $2,213
- Second area, 2011: $1,523
- Second area, 2016: $2,009
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: $1,839
- First area, 2016: $2,012
- First area, 2021: $2,216
- Second area, 2011: $1,646
- Second area, 2016: $2,045
- Second area, 2021: $2,233
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $430
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $480
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $390
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $2,260
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,392
- Second area, 2011: $2,500
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Belimbla Park with nearby areas
Compare Mount Hunter with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Belimbla Park vs Mount Hunter [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10261/belimbla-park/vs/SAL12776/mount-hunter